EdTribune NM - New Mexico Education Data

The White-Hispanic Gap Narrowed by Half in Eight Years

Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Correction (July 20, 2026): The core finding is unchanged: the white-Hispanic graduation gap narrowed from 11.5 to 5.9 percentage points between the 2009 and 2017 cohorts. An earlier version, however, used an unsupported 60% enrollment-share claim to attribute the statewide gain primarily to Hispanic students. It also said the 2016 Hispanic five-year rate remained below where white students started; at 75.4%, it was above the 2009 white four-year rate but 0.6 point below the 2016 white four-year rate. Those claims have been corrected or removed.

Eight years ago, the graduation gap between white and Hispanic students in New Mexico stood at 11.5 percentage points -- white students at 74.5%, Hispanic students at 63.0%.

By 2017, that gap had shrunk to 5.9 points. Not because white students fell, but because Hispanic students climbed 7.5 points to 70.5%, the fastest improvement of any racial group in the state.

The gap narrowed because Hispanic students improved faster than white students over these endpoints. The graduation files establish that rate comparison but do not contain the enrollment composition needed to assign each subgroup's contribution to the statewide change.

The fastest improvers

Hispanic students gained 7.5 percentage points between 2009 and 2017, the largest improvement of any racial subgroup in the state. Black students gained 6.5 points. Asian students gained 5.4. Native American students gained 3.2. White students, starting from a higher base, gained 1.9.

The overall state rate moved from 66.1% to 71.1% over the same cohorts. That parallel movement does not, by itself, prove how much of the statewide increase came from any one subgroup.

The shape of the narrowing

The gap did not narrow at a steady pace. It held essentially flat at 11.5 points from 2009 through 2010, then began closing as Hispanic students improved while white rates leveled off.

From 2011 to 2016, the gap closed every single year, from 11.2 points to just 5.0 in 2016. The narrowing was driven from both sides during the mid-decade: white rates declined from their 2011-2012 peak of 77.4-77.5% to 73.6% in 2015, while Hispanic rates held relatively steady.

In 2017, the gap ticked back up to 5.9 points as white rates recovered (76.4%) while Hispanic rates dipped slightly from their 2016 peak of 71.0% to 70.5%. Whether this represents a pause or a reversal is impossible to tell from one year of data.

What 70.5% means

The Hispanic graduation rate of 70.5% is an achievement relative to where it started. Its complement is 29.5%, meaning nearly three in ten students in that cohort did not earn a diploma within four years.

The five-year data add another view: Hispanic students gain 4.4 points with an extra year, reaching 75.4% for the 2016 cohort. That was 0.6 point below the 2016 white four-year rate of 76.0%.

The comparison that remains

The in-state gap narrowing is real progress, but the 2017 Hispanic rate remained 5.9 points below the white rate. The available series ends there, so it cannot show whether the gap kept closing after 2017.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

The Navajo Region: Six Districts Where Fewer Than 70% of Students Graduate

Thu, 18 Jun 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In northwestern New Mexico, where the Navajo Nation extends across mesas and high desert, six school districts share a common problem. None of them graduates 70% of their students on time.

Zuni Public Schools^↗ sits at 55.0%. Cuba Independent Schools^↗ at 62.3%. Bloomfield Schools^↗ at 65.6%. Farmington Municipal Schools^↗ at 66.2%. Gallup McKinley County Schools^↗ at 67.2%. Central Consolidated Schools^↗ at 67.5%.

Every one of these districts falls below the state average of 71.1%. Together, they form a regional graduation crisis that is not about one failing school or one struggling district but about an entire geography where the education system produces outcomes that fall short.

Parallel trajectories

The six districts have not moved in lockstep, but they have shared a pattern over the ACGR era: oscillation within a band, without sustained breakthrough.

Farmington's trajectory is the most instructive. The district reached 71.7% in 2015, briefly crossing the state average. Then it fell back to 71.0% in 2016 and 66.2% in 2017 -- a 5.5-point decline in two years that erased three years of gains. The pattern has repeated across the data window: the rate climbed from 65.9% (2011) to 70.5% (2012), dropped to 67.5% (2013), recovered to 69.6% (2014) and 71.7% (2015), then dropped again.

Gallup-McKinley, the region's largest district, has shown a similar pattern of modest gains followed by retreats. Central Consolidated and Bloomfield have stayed in the mid-60s throughout. Cuba has been the most volatile, swinging from the 50s to the 70s.

Zuni is the outlier in scale -- its 55.0% rate in 2017 is far below the others -- but the pattern of instability is the same. The district reached 79.4% in 2012, crashed to 54.9% in 2014, partially recovered, and crashed again.

What unites these districts

Geography is the obvious common factor. These districts span the Navajo Nation and the Zuni Pueblo reservation in the Four Corners region. They serve predominantly Native American student populations in communities where poverty rates are among the highest in the state and the country.

But other factors may matter as much as demographics. These districts face chronic teacher shortages, with vacancy rates that far exceed the state average. The distances involved -- some students travel 60 miles or more each way on dirt roads -- create attendance challenges that compound over four years. And the relationship between tribal sovereignty and state education policy creates governance complexity that urban districts do not face.

The Yazzie/Martinez ruling, which found the state had systematically failed its Native American students, cited exactly this kind of regional pattern. The court found that the state had not provided the resources, the culturally relevant curriculum, or the teacher quality that these communities needed.

The regional context

The six districts collectively educate a substantial share of New Mexico's Native American student population. Gallup-McKinley alone is one of the 10 largest districts in the state. Farmington is a mid-size city that serves both Navajo Nation students and students from the broader San Juan County area.

The regional nature of the problem is significant because it suggests causes that operate at a level above individual district leadership. A single failing district can be explained by poor management or bad luck. Six districts, spanning hundreds of miles and serving different tribal communities, all stuck below 70% suggests systemic forces at work.

Those forces might include the same ones that produce low graduation rates in rural and reservation communities nationwide: inadequate funding formulas that do not account for the cost of serving remote populations, difficulty recruiting and retaining teachers in isolated areas, and the compounding effects of poverty on educational attainment.

Since 2017

The data ends with the Class of 2017. The intervening years have brought both additional challenges (COVID-19 hit Navajo Nation communities with devastating force) and additional resources (the Yazzie/Martinez compliance funding, federal pandemic relief dollars, and increased tribal investment in education).

Whether those investments have broken the pattern of oscillation in these districts is a question that more recent data would need to answer. Through 2017, the pattern was clear: improvement in these communities has been real but fragile, gained and lost in cycles that never produced the sustained movement needed to close the gap with the rest of the state.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Espanola's Graduation Rate Climbed to 65.5% in 2017, but a 44-Point Gap Separates Its Native American Students

Thu, 28 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Correction (May 29, 2026): An earlier version of this article overstated one comparison and several figures. Espanola's 21.5% rate was the lowest Native American graduation rate of any New Mexico district in 2017, not the lowest of any subgroup in any district. The rate was about 35% of the statewide figure for Native American students (not "less than a third"), the nine-year district average for Native American students was roughly 50% (not 46%), and Bernalillo's equity gap was 11.2 points (not 10.9). The displayed numbers have been corrected.

In 2017, Espanola Public Schools^↗ graduated 65.5% of its students on time, the highest overall rate the district had posted since New Mexico began publishing four-year cohort figures. The rate had climbed from the mid-50s, part of a three-year upward slope that the district carried into the end of the available data.

That progress did not reach everyone. Among Espanola's Native American students, the four-year graduation rate that year was 21.5%, the lowest Native American graduation rate of any district in New Mexico in 2017. It sat 44 percentage points below the district's overall rate, which itself trailed the state average by nearly six points. Statewide, about six in ten Native American students graduated on time in 2017; in Espanola, the figure was about 35% of that statewide rate for their demographic group.

The volatility beneath

The 2017 figure is stark, but it did not come from nowhere. Native American graduation rates in Espanola have been volatile for as long as the state has measured them.

The rate has swung between a low of 21.5% in 2017 and a high of 69.5% in 2014. In between, it has moved by double digits in a single year more than once. The rate jumped from 47.5% (2013) to 69.5% (2014), then fell to 57.1% (2015), 48.0% (2016), and dropped sharply to 21.5% (2017).

These swings likely reflect small cohort sizes. When a graduating class has only a handful of Native American students, the graduation or non-graduation of two or three individuals can move the rate by 20 points. But the long-term average tells the same story as the extremes: across nine years, the rate never exceeded 70% and averaged roughly 50%.

A district that has struggled broadly

Espanola's problems are not limited to its Native American students. The district's overall graduation rate has been among the lowest of any mid-size district in the state.

From 2009 to 2017, the overall rate ranged from a low of 45.2% (2011) to a high of 65.5% (2017). The trajectory shows improvement, with the rate climbing from the mid-50s to the mid-60s over the period, but the gains have been unsteady. A jump to 62.8% in 2012 was followed by declines in 2013 and 2014. The rate did not surpass its 2012 level again until 2016.

The district ended the data window on an upward slope, posting 64.0% in 2016 and 65.5% in 2017. Whether that trajectory continued into subsequent years is beyond what this data can show.

The widest gap in the state

Espanola's 44-point gap between its overall and Native American graduation rates was the widest in the state in 2017. For comparison, Albuquerque Public Schools had a 13.3-point gap, Bernalillo had an 11.2-point gap, and Gallup-McKinley had a 2.1-point gap.

The districts with the narrowest gaps tend to be those where Native American students are the majority and the overall rate is itself low. In Gallup-McKinley and Central Consolidated, for instance, the Native American rate is close to the overall rate because most students are Native American. In Espanola, Native American students are a significant but not majority presence, and the gap reflects different outcomes for different groups within the same schools.

The valley's other crisis

Espanola sits in the Rio Grande Valley between the Ohkay Owingeh and Santa Clara Pueblos. Its student body includes children from both pueblos, from surrounding rural areas, and from the town itself. The dynamics of a school district that serves tribal communities without being a tribal school system create particular tensions around culture, curriculum, and governance that enrollment and graduation numbers cannot measure.

The district has also been affected by the opioid epidemic, which hit the Espanola Valley harder than nearly anywhere else in the country. Research from the New Mexico Department of Health has documented some of the highest overdose death rates in the nation in Rio Arriba County, where Espanola is located. The relationship between community health crises and educational outcomes is difficult to quantify but impossible to ignore.

The 21.5% figure demands context, and some of that context (cohort sizes, specific interventions, tribal education partnerships) is not available in the state graduation data. But the scale of the gap and its persistence are beyond dispute. Across nearly a decade, Espanola has graduated its Native American students at rates far below its other students, far below the state average, and far below what the Yazzie/Martinez ruling found constitutionally adequate.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

The Extra Year: How a 5th Year Gives Black Students a 7-Point Boost

Thu, 21 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT

The standard measure of graduation success is the four-year rate. But New Mexico also tracks five-year and six-year rates, and the gap between them tells a story about who is close to graduating and who is being left behind by the four-year clock.

For the Class of 2016, Black students gained 7.0 percentage points when given a fifth year, moving from 61.0% to 68.0%. That was the largest gain of any subgroup. Native American students gained 5.8 points. Economically disadvantaged students gained 5.5. White students gained 4.3.

The pattern is consistent: the groups with the lowest four-year rates benefit most from additional time.

The inverse relationship

The subgroup data reveals a near-perfect inverse correlation between four-year rates and fifth-year gains. Students who struggle most to finish in four years are not simply dropping out. Many are staying in school and finishing one year late.

Black students start at 61.0% and reach 68.0% with a fifth year. Native American students go from 63.0% to 68.8%. Male students move from 67.0% to 72.0%. At the top end, female students go from 76.0% to 80.0%, a four-point gain, and white students from 76.0% to 80.3%.

The five-year rate narrows, but does not close, the equity gaps. The 13-point gap between white and Native American four-year rates (76% vs. 63%) shrinks to 11.5 points at the five-year mark (80.3% vs. 68.8%). The gap between white and Black students narrows from 15 to 12.3 points.

Compounding with a sixth year

For the 2014 cohort, which has six-year rate data available, the state's overall graduation rate went from 69.3% (four-year) to 70.5% (five-year) to 79.0% (six-year).

The six-year jump of 8.5 points from the five-year rate is notably larger than the 1.2-point five-year gain from the four-year rate for this cohort. The 2014 cohort's five-year rate appears unusually compressed (other cohort years show more typical four-to-five-year gains), but the six-year rate suggests a substantial group of students who need two additional years rather than one.

At the six-year mark, nearly four in five students in the 2014 cohort had graduated. That 79.0% rate approaches where the national four-year average was at the time, raising the question of whether New Mexico's graduation challenge is partly a timing problem rather than purely a completion problem.

What this means for accountability

New Mexico's ESSA state plan includes four-year, five-year, and six-year graduation rates in its school accountability system. This is one of the more nuanced approaches in the country; many states weight only the four-year rate.

The data supports that approach. A district where 61% of Black students graduate in four years but 68% graduate in five is a different place than one where 61% graduate and the rest disappear from the system entirely. The five-year data suggests that these students are persisting. They are taking longer, but they are finishing.

The policy question is what kind of support could convert fifth-year graduates into fourth-year graduates, or whether the emphasis on the four-year timeline itself creates a framework that penalizes schools serving students who need more time. Students who transfer between schools, who miss significant instructional time, or who are learning English while completing coursework may be on a path to graduation that simply does not fit a four-year window.

The limits of extended-rate data

The five-year and six-year rate data in New Mexico is available only at the state level for a limited range of cohorts (five-year: 2012-2016, six-year: 2010-2015). District-level extended rates are not available in the state data, which means it is impossible to know whether the subgroup patterns hold across different communities.

Cohort counts are also unavailable (every cell is blank), so the rates cannot be converted to absolute numbers. How many additional Black students graduated in year five? How many Native American students? The percentages suggest the numbers are meaningful, but the actual count is unknown.

The four-year rate undercounts graduation for exactly the students who most need to be counted. For Black and Native American students in New Mexico, the fifth year is not a consolation prize. It is how a significant share of them earn diplomas.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Four-year and five-year rates for 2016 cohort; six-year rates for 2014 cohort.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

From 69% to 86%: How Hobbs Became One of New Mexico's Graduation Success Stories

Thu, 14 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In 2009, Hobbs Municipal Schools^↗ graduated 69.4% of its students on time, three points above the state average but nowhere near the top of the rankings. By 2017, the district was at 86.1%, fifteen points above the state and among the highest-performing mid-size districts in New Mexico.

The 16.7 percentage-point climb over eight years was not incremental. It came in a sustained run of improvement from 2012 to 2016 that added nearly 13 points in just four years.

The trajectory

Hobbs started the ACGR era at 69.4% in 2009, slightly above the state. The rate dipped to 64.6% in 2011 before a turnaround that lasted five consecutive years. From 2012 to 2016, the rate climbed steadily: 74.3%, 78.1%, 83.7%, 84.8%, and 87.0%. In 2017, it dipped slightly to 86.1%, but the district had established itself at a level most New Mexico districts have never reached.

The improvement was not driven by a single year or a statistical blip. Five straight years of gains, ranging from 1.1 to 9.7 points each, suggest structural changes rather than cohort variation.

The equity story

What makes Hobbs' improvement notable is who was graduating. This is not a wealthy suburb where high graduation rates follow from high incomes. Hobbs is a Permian Basin oil town in Lea County, and its student body reflects that economy.

In 2017, students who are economically disadvantaged in Hobbs graduated at 81.8%. Hispanic students, the district's largest demographic group, graduated at 86.0%, nearly identical to the overall rate. Students learning English posted 78.9%. Male students, who statewide graduated at just 67.2%, reached 84.0% in Hobbs.

Every major subgroup in Hobbs outperformed the statewide average for that same subgroup by double digits. Hispanic students in Hobbs (86.0%) were 15.5 points above the state Hispanic average (70.5%). Students who are economically disadvantaged (81.8%) were 15.4 points above the state average for that group (66.4%).

Students with disabilities graduated at 72.5%, the lowest subgroup rate in the district but still 11 points above the statewide rate for students with disabilities.

Against the peers

Hobbs did not just outperform the state. It outperformed its geographic and demographic peers in southeastern New Mexico.

Artesia Public Schools, another Lea County district, posted 82.9% in 2017. Lovington Municipal Schools, the Lea County seat, reached 81.0%. Both strong, but neither matched Hobbs.

Further afield, Clovis Municipal Schools came in at 77.9%, Carlsbad Municipal Schools at 69.0%, and Roswell Independent Schools at 65.8%. Roswell, the largest city in the region, graduated students at a rate 20 points below Hobbs.

These are districts with similar economic profiles: oil and gas economies, high poverty rates, significant Hispanic populations. The variance in outcomes across them makes the case that district-level decisions matter more than regional economics alone.

The unanswered question

The numbers show what happened but not why. Hobbs' improvement coincided with the Permian Basin oil boom that brought an influx of families and investment to the region. Whether the boom helped graduation rates, through increased local tax revenue or a tighter job market that kept families stable, is a question the data cannot answer.

The 2011 dip to 64.6% preceded the improvement streak and may have been a catalyst. Districts sometimes reform graduation tracking and support systems after a low year. Whether Hobbs implemented specific interventions, such as credit recovery programs, attendance initiatives, or graduation coaches, would require reporting beyond what the state data provides.

Hobbs' 86.1% rate in 2017 matched the national average. The state as a whole sat 16 points below it. Whatever this Permian Basin district did differently, and the data alone cannot say what, it produced outcomes that most of New Mexico has never approached.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

The 15-Point Gap: Native American Students Graduate at 61% in New Mexico

Thu, 07 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Correction (May 7, 2026): An earlier version of this article reported that 15 districts disclosed Native American graduation rates in 2017 and that none exceeded 80%. The correct counts are 23 districts reporting, with Dulce (83.9%), Rio Rancho (81.4%), and Magdalena (81.1%) above 80%.

For nearly a decade, the gap between Native American and white graduation rates in New Mexico has refused to close.

In 2017, 61.0% of Native American students earned a diploma within four years. White students graduated at 76.4%. The 15.4 percentage-point gap between them is almost exactly where it started in 2009, when the state first adopted the Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate.

The numbers moved in the middle of the decade. By 2015, the white-Native American gap had narrowed to 10.7 points, driven partly by Native American rates climbing from 57.8% to 62.9% in six years. Then the progress reversed. Between 2015 and 2017, Native American graduation rates fell back to 61.0% while white rates recovered to 76.4%, stretching the gap back to 15.4 points.

A gap the courts noticed

In 2018, Judge Sarah Singleton ruled in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez case that New Mexico had systematically failed its Native American, low-income, and English Language Learner students. The ruling, which found the state's education system constitutionally inadequate, cited exactly the kind of persistent gaps these graduation numbers document.

The graduation data predates the ruling by one year. But the pattern the court described -- decades of underfunding and neglect of at-risk populations -- shows up clearly in the trend line. Native American students improved by just 3.2 percentage points over eight years, compared to 7.5 points for Hispanic students and 1.9 points for white students over the same period.

Where the gaps are widest

The statewide average masks district-level variation that ranges from devastating to somewhat less devastating.

Espanola Public Schools^↗ reported a 21.5% Native American graduation rate in 2017, the lowest in the state. Just one in five Native American students in the district earned a diploma on time. The gap between Espanola's overall rate (65.5%) and its Native American rate was 44 percentage points -- the widest intra-district gap of any district reporting the data.

Bernalillo Public Schools^↗, serving communities near the Sandia and Santa Ana Pueblos, graduated Native American students at 45.6%. Zuni Public Schools^↗, serving the Zuni Pueblo, came in at 54.0%. Albuquerque Public Schools^↗, which educates more Native American students than any other district in the state, posted a 54.6% rate.

Of the 23 districts reporting Native American graduation rates in 2017, the highest were Dulce^↗ at 83.9%, Rio Rancho^↗ at 81.4%, and Magdalena^↗ at 81.1%. Each shows that Native American students can graduate at or above the statewide average when district conditions support it. But the median district rate was 66.5%, and only six districts cleared 75%.

The fifth-year window

One piece of the data suggests how close some of these students come. New Mexico reports 5-year graduation rates for earlier cohorts, and Native American students gain 5.8 percentage points with an extra year -- from 63.0% to 68.8% for the 2016 cohort.

That gain is the second-largest of any subgroup, behind Black students (+7.0 points). It suggests that a substantial number of Native American students are within reach of graduation but need more time, more support, or both.

The 5-year rate still leaves Native American students below where white students start with just four years (76.0% in 2016). But it narrows the functional gap and raises a question about whether the state's accountability system, which weights the 4-year rate most heavily, penalizes districts that serve students needing more flexible pathways.

The subgroup ranking

In 2017, Native American students ranked at the very bottom of the state's subgroup graduation rates at 61.0%, narrowly below students with disabilities at 61.5%. Economically disadvantaged students graduated at 66.4%, male students at 67.2%, and Black students at 67.9%. At the top, Asian students graduated at 85.4%.

The state average of 71.1% is itself nearly 16 points below the national average of roughly 87%. Native American students in New Mexico graduate at rates 26 points below where the average American student does.

Beyond the numbers

The graduation data ends with the Class of 2017. Recent reporting from the New Mexico Public Education Department shows the statewide rate reached 80.6% for the Class of 2025, suggesting significant improvement in the years beyond this data window.

What the data also cannot show is how many of these students left school for reasons the graduation rate doesn't capture: students who transferred to tribal schools not reflected in state data, students who earned GEDs or alternative credentials, or students who returned to school after the four-year window closed. The cohort count columns in the state data are entirely blank, making it impossible to calculate how many students the 61% rate represents in absolute terms.

What the data does show, unambiguously, is that the gap between Native American students and their peers remained wider in 2017 than it was when the state started measuring it. Eight years of modest statewide improvement produced only 3.2 percentage points of progress for Native American students, and even that was erased in the gap calculation by faster improvement among white students.

The Yazzie/Martinez ruling ordered the state to provide a sufficient education to all students. The graduation rate is one measure of whether that mandate is being met. Through 2017, it was not.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017. Five-year rates available for cohorts 2012-2016. National average from NCES.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Albuquerque's 2017 Graduation Rate Held at 67.9% While the State Reached 71.1%

Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Albuquerque Public Schools^↗ educates more than a quarter of New Mexico's students -- about 27% of the statewide total. In 2017, the district graduated 67.9% of them on time.

That rate is 3.2 points below the state average and 18 points below what Las Cruces^↗ achieved the same year. Over eight years of ACGR measurement, Albuquerque gained just 2.8 percentage points -- barely more than a third of a point per year -- while the state gained five.

In this series: the state's 16-point gap with the nation and the gender chasm between New Mexico boys and girls.

Stuck in a band

The most telling feature of Albuquerque's graduation data is how narrow the range has been. From 2009 to 2017, the rate bounced between 61.7% and 68.7%. The swings were sharp -- a 7.0-point drop from 2013 to 2015, a 6.2-point gain from 2015 to 2017 -- but they largely cancelled each other out.

The district hit its lowest point in 2015 at 61.7%, a level that would be alarming in any context but particularly in the state's largest school system. The recovery to 67.9% by 2017 brought the rate back to approximately where it had started in 2009 (65.1%) -- progress, but of the most frustrating kind, recapturing ground that had already been covered.

The subgroup gaps inside APS

Within Albuquerque, the disparities follow the statewide pattern but are sharper in some cases.

Native American students in APS graduated at 54.6%, 13.3 points below the district average and 6.4 points below the statewide Native American average. Students who are economically disadvantaged graduated at 61.6%. Male students at 63.1%.

Across the major race and gender subgroups, APS sat below the statewide rate for that group. White students at APS (75.5%) trailed the statewide white rate (76.4%) by nearly a point. Asian students at APS (83.3%) trailed the statewide Asian rate (85.4%) by two. Hispanic students in APS (65.8%) were nearly five points below the statewide Hispanic average of 70.5%.

The one notable exception was the district's English learners. At 69.4%, APS students learning English exceeded the statewide rate for that subgroup (68.1%) and even exceeded the district's Hispanic rate. The district's dual-language programs and newcomer supports appear to be producing results for this specific population.

The weight on the state average

When a district this large underperforms, it affects everything above it. Albuquerque's 67.9% rate, applied to more than a quarter of the state's students, acts as an anchor on the statewide number. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that if APS had matched the state average of 71.1%, the state average itself would have been perhaps a point higher.

The comparison with Las Cruces is instructive. Both districts started the ACGR era in the mid-60s. Both serve majority-Hispanic student populations with significant low-income enrollment. Las Cruces ended at 85.5%. Albuquerque ended at 67.9%. The starting conditions were similar; the outcomes were not.

Recent context

Reporting from Albuquerque Public Schools shows the district reached 75.9% for the Class of 2024, a substantial improvement beyond the data window. That improvement, if sustained, would represent the kind of movement that the 2009-2017 data never managed to produce.

But even 75.9% would leave APS below where Las Cruces and Hobbs^↗ were in 2017. The district's challenge is not just improving but closing the gap with its peers -- a gap that grew wider during the very years the data covers.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

The Gender Chasm: New Mexico Boys Graduate at 67%, Girls at 75%

Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In every year since New Mexico started measuring four-year graduation rates, girls have outpaced boys by at least seven and a half percentage points. In most years, the gap has been closer to nine.

For the Class of 2017, 75.1% of female students graduated on time. For male students, 67.2%. That 7.9-point gap is roughly three points wider than the national average gender gap of approximately five points.

A gap that refuses to narrow

The consistency of the gap is its most striking feature. From 2009 to 2017, the female-male graduation gap never dropped below 7.5 points (in 2009) and peaked at 9.5 points (in 2012). Both genders improved over the period -- girls by 5.1 points, boys by 4.7 -- but the improvement was almost perfectly parallel, leaving the gap functionally unchanged.

The gap narrowed slightly at the bookends: 7.5 points in 2009 and 7.9 in 2017. But the years between tell a different story. In 2012, girls reached 75.3% while boys sat at 65.8%, a 9.5-point gap that was the widest of the ACGR era. The mid-decade decline in overall rates hit both genders, but boys bottomed out lower (64.6% in 2015) than girls (72.8%).

Where boys fall in the ranking

The 67.2% male graduation rate is not just below the female rate. It falls below nearly every other subgroup in the state.

Economically disadvantaged students graduated at 66.4% in 2017, barely below male students at 67.2%. Black students graduated at 67.9%, just above. Only Native American students (61.0%) and students with disabilities (61.5%) ranked lower than boys as a group.

Put another way: being male in New Mexico is associated with a lower graduation rate than being economically disadvantaged. That comparison is imprecise -- many male students are also economically disadvantaged -- but it illustrates how large the gender effect is relative to other factors.

The district picture

At the district level, gender gaps range from negligible to enormous.

In 2017, Jemez Valley Public Schools reported a 32.1-point gender gap (77.1% for girls, 45.0% for boys). Cuba Independent Schools had a 29.0-point gap. In both cases, small cohort sizes mean individual students can shift the numbers substantially. But the pattern repeats across enough districts to suggest something beyond statistical noise.

Among larger districts, Albuquerque Public Schools (10.0 points) and Santa Fe Public Schools (10.5 points) sit just above the 7.9-point statewide gap. Las Cruces Public Schools runs counter to the pattern at 5.6 points, with both boys (82.8%) and girls (88.4%) graduating at well above the state average.

The improvement that was not enough

Boys did improve. The 4.7-point gain from 62.5% (2009) to 67.2% (2017) represents real progress. In absolute terms, more boys graduated in 2017 than in any previous year measured.

But girls improved faster. And the national average for boys, while also below the national average for girls, sits somewhere in the low 80s -- more than 15 points above where New Mexico's boys are. The state's gender gap is not just a reflection of a national pattern amplified; it exists on top of an already-low base rate.

The 67.2% rate means roughly one in three boys in New Mexico does not earn a diploma within four years. For girls, it is one in four. Both numbers are too high, but the gap between them has proven remarkably resistant to eight years of statewide graduation improvement.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017. National gender gap estimate from NCES.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

New Mexico's 71% Graduation Rate Leaves It 16 Points Behind the Nation

Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Correction: An earlier version of this article stated that boys' graduation rate was lower than the rate for economically disadvantaged students. At 67.2%, the 2017 male graduation rate was slightly higher than the 66.4% economically-disadvantaged rate. The article has been updated.

New Mexico's four-year graduation rate reached 71.1% for the Class of 2017. The national average was roughly 87%.

That 15.9 percentage-point gap means New Mexico graduates its students at a rate nearly one-sixth lower than the country as a whole. The gap has narrowed somewhat since 2009, when the state first adopted the Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate and measured 66.1%. But five points of improvement over eight years still leaves the state closer to where it started than to where it needs to be.

The three phases

The state's journey from 66% to 71% was not a steady climb. It came in three distinct phases.

From 2009 to 2012, the rate improved by 4.3 points. Each year brought a gain: 1.2 points, then 1.4, then 1.7. By 2012, New Mexico had crossed 70% for the first time since adopting the ACGR methodology, reaching 70.4%.

Then the progress reversed. From 2013 to 2015, the rate slid back 1.8 points to 68.6%. The losses were modest individually -- a tenth of a point here, a full point there -- but they erased nearly half the gains of the previous three years.

The third phase brought recovery. In 2016, the rate jumped 2.4 points to 71.0%, the largest single-year gain of the ACGR era. In 2017, it edged up to 71.1%. The state had recovered its ground and set a new high -- but barely exceeded where it had been five years earlier.

Who improved, who did not

The statewide number obscures very different trajectories for different groups of students.

Hispanic students, who make up the largest share of New Mexico's student population, improved the most: 7.5 percentage points, from 63.0% to 70.5%. Black students and economically disadvantaged students each gained 6.5 points. Asian students moved from 80.0% to 85.4%.

At the bottom of the improvement list: Native American students gained just 3.2 points (57.8% to 61.0%), and white students gained 1.9 points (74.5% to 76.4%). White students started higher and moved less. Native American students started lowest and moved least.

The male-female gap persisted throughout. In 2017, female students graduated at 75.1%, male students at 67.2%. Boys' graduation rate was slightly higher than the 66.4% rate for economically disadvantaged students.

A state of contrasts

The state average pulls together 90 districts that range from 100% to below 50%.

In 2017, 21 districts graduated above 85% -- nearly all of them small rural districts where a graduating class might number in the single digits. At the other end, 26 districts graduated below 70%, including Albuquerque Public Schools^↗ at 67.9%, the state's largest district by a wide margin.

The median district graduated at 78.6%, well above the state average. That gap between the median and the mean reflects the outsized weight of Albuquerque^↗, which educates roughly a third of the state's students and sits below the state average. When the state's largest district underperforms, it drags down the statewide number disproportionately.

Two large districts broke the pattern. Las Cruces Public Schools^↗, the state's second-largest, climbed from 64.9% in 2009 to 85.5% in 2017, a 20.6-point improvement that made it the highest-performing large district in the state. Hobbs Municipal Schools^↗, a Permian Basin oil town, went from 69.4% to 86.1%.

The 75% threshold New Mexico never reached

New Mexico never crossed 75% during the data window. The state reached 70% and then spent five years stuck there. That 70-75% range -- between "most students graduate" and "three-quarters graduate" -- proved harder to push through than the climb from 66%.

More recent data from the New Mexico Public Education Department shows the state reached 80.6% for the Class of 2025. That suggests the rate accelerated significantly after our data window ends, during a period that included the Yazzie/Martinez ruling and a substantial increase in state education funding.

The question the data through 2017 cannot answer is what finally broke the plateau -- whether it was the additional funding, the court mandate, pandemic-era policy changes, or some combination. What the data does show is that the first eight years of ACGR measurement produced five points of improvement and a prolonged stall.

At 71.1%, New Mexico in 2017 was roughly where the national average had been a decade earlier. The gap was not closing so much as the state was running the same race on a significant delay.

Data from the New Mexico Public Education Department. Graduation rates are 4-year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates (ACGR) for cohorts 2009-2017. National average from NCES.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

New Mexico's Kindergarten Class Has Shrunk 20% Since 2016

Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In 2015-16, New Mexico's public schools enrolled 3,520 more kindergartners than 12th-graders. That surplus meant the system was replenishing itself: more students entering at the bottom than exiting at the top. By 2023-24, the math had reversed. Grade 12 exceeded kindergarten by 2,828 students, a swing of more than 6,300 in annual pipeline pressure. The school system is now consuming itself faster than it can refill.

Kindergarten enrollment fell from 24,729 to 19,688 over that span, a 20.4% decline. Grade 12, meanwhile, rose 6.2%, from 21,209 to 22,516. The two lines crossed somewhere in the gap between 2018 and 2024, and every kindergarten class since has entered a system with more seniors leaving than five-year-olds arriving.

The bottom fell out first

The damage is concentrated in the youngest grades. Elementary enrollment (K through 5th grade) fell 17.7%, a loss of 27,581 students. That accounts for 81% of the state's total K-12 decline of 34,034 over the period. Middle school (grades 6-8) lost 8.5%. High school lost 78 students, or 0.1%.

Grade 1 fell even harder than kindergarten: down 5,687 students, a 21.4% decline. Grades 2 and 3 followed closely, down 18.0% and 19.4%. The losses attenuate moving up the grade ladder. By 8th grade, the decline is 6.7%. By 10th grade, enrollment actually grew, if barely: up 226 students, or 0.9%.

The structural result is visible in how the system's weight has shifted. In 2015-16, high school students (grades 9-12) accounted for 30.2% of K-12 enrollment. By 2023-24, that share had risen to 33.6%. The system is aging in place: the upper grades hold steady while the lower grades empty.

A birth decline that preceded COVID by years

The kindergarten collapse did not begin with the pandemic. New Mexico's births peaked at 30,475 in 2007 and have fallen nearly every year since, reaching 20,598 in 2023, a 32.4% decline over 16 years. The children entering kindergarten in 2023-24 were born in 2018 and 2019, when the state recorded roughly 22,900 births per year. The children who entered kindergarten in 2015-16 were born in 2010 and 2011, when births still exceeded 27,000.

The fertility rate tells the same story. New Mexico's total fertility rate dropped from 2,308 per 1,000 women of reproductive age in 2007 to 1,519 in 2023, a rate well below the replacement level of 2,100. The state's rate had historically exceeded the national average but fell below it in 2014 and has remained there since.

The decline was steepest among teens. The teen birth rate for 15- to 19-year-olds fell 59% between 2010 and 2020, from 53.1 to 21.8 per 1,000. Because New Mexico's teen birth rate was historically among the nation's highest, this category accounted for an outsized share of the total drop.

COVID did accelerate the broader enrollment decline, with the state losing 14,323 students in a single year (2020-21). But the kindergarten pipeline was already hollowing out. Between 2015-16 and 2017-18, kindergarten fell from 24,729 to 23,793, a decline of 936 students over two years, before grade-level data goes dark until 2023-24.

Albuquerque drives the statewide loss

Albuquerque^↗ Public Schools lost 1,932 kindergartners between 2015-16 and 2023-24, a 28.4% decline that is steeper than the state average. That single district accounts for 38.3% of the statewide K loss.

The losses run deep across every region. Las Cruces^↗ lost 346 kindergartners (-18.8%). Santa Fe^↗ lost 259 (-25.5%). Gadsden lost 226 (-23.4%). Farmington lost 202 (-24.1%). Espanola^↗, the small northern district that has lost a third of its total enrollment since 2016, saw its kindergarten class drop from 330 to 190, a 42.4% decline.

Several smaller districts lost more than 40% of their kindergarten enrollment: Silver City (-43.9%), Bloomfield (-43.0%), Central (-41.5%). In districts this small, the losses translate to individual classrooms disappearing. Silver City went from 253 kindergartners to 142, a drop that likely means consolidating from multiple sections to one or two.

No large district escaped. Among the state's 10 largest K enrollment districts in 2015-16, every one posted a decline.

The 9th-grade influx masks the pipeline break

One feature of New Mexico's grade structure complicates a clean pipeline reading. In both 2015-16 and 2023-24, 9th-grade enrollment exceeded 8th grade by roughly 4,000 students: a 17.1% bump in 2016 and 16.5% in 2024. This likely reflects students entering public high schools from Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools, tribal schools, and private K-8 programs. New Mexico has approximately 7,400 students in BIE-funded schools, many of which serve only elementary and middle grades.

This influx is what keeps high school enrollment stable even as the lower grades thin. Without those roughly 4,000 additional 9th-graders entering from outside the public K-8 system each year, high school enrollment would show meaningful decline too. It also means the pipeline problem is, in some sense, larger than it appears: the public K-8 system is shrinking by more than the high school numbers suggest, because an external source of students partially compensates at the 9th-grade transition.

Pre-K grew while K shrank

One counterintuitive bright spot: pre-K enrollment rose 41.0%, from 8,123 to 11,456, over the same period kindergarten fell 20.4%. The divergence reflects New Mexico's aggressive investment in early childhood education. The state created a dedicated funding stream from the Land Grant Permanent Fund in 2022, and by the 2022-23 school year, 45% of four-year-olds were enrolled in a pre-K program, up from 1% in 2002.

"New Mexico did something remarkable." — Steve Barnett, founder, National Institute for Early Education Research, April 2024

Barnett was referring to the constitutional amendment that guarantees funding for early childhood programs, not to the enrollment trend specifically. But the pre-K expansion creates an irony: the state is reaching more children earlier than ever, yet fewer of them exist. The 3,333-student pre-K gain reflects expanded access to existing children, not a growing population. Those same children show up in the kindergarten numbers a year later, where they join a shrinking cohort.

What the pipeline predicts

The kindergarten-to-12th-grade gap will persist for at least a decade. The children who will enter kindergarten in 2030 have already been born, and their cohort is smaller than the one currently in 5th grade.

New Mexico's total enrollment has fallen from 339,613 in 2015-16 to 298,353 in 2025-26, a loss of 41,260 students (12.1%). The pipeline inversion guarantees that this decline will continue even if migration and retention hold steady, because the system loses more seniors each spring than it gains kindergartners each fall.

The fiscal consequences are direct. New Mexico's public school funding formula allocates dollars based on membership counts. Districts with membership over 8,000 that lost at least 10% of enrollment between fiscal years 2025 and 2026 are now allowed to average their membership across two years for funding purposes, a legislative buffer that acknowledges the scale of decline but does not reverse it. For a district like Albuquerque, which has lost 19,579 total students since 2015-16, averaging across two years smooths the curve but does not change its direction.

A district that lost 40% of its kindergartners eight years ago will, within the next four to five years, see that same-sized hole in its 4th- and 5th-grade classrooms. The wave is moving upward through the system, one grade per year, and it has not yet reached the grades where staffing and facilities were built for larger cohorts. Silver City went from 253 kindergartners to 142. Those 142 will be Silver City's 5th-grade class in 2029. The building will not have gotten smaller by then.

A note on the data: Grade-level enrollment is only available from NM PED for 2015-16 through 2017-18 and for 2023-24 (80-Day count). The years 2018-19 through 2022-23 and 2024-25 through 2025-26 report only statewide totals without grade breakdowns. The kindergarten and grade 12 figures cited in this article are from the bookend years with grade-level data, not interpolated estimates.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

59 New Mexico Districts at Record-Low Enrollment

Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT

New Mexico's public schools enrolled 298,353 students in 2025-26, falling below 300,000 for the first time in the state's dataset. That 2.7% single-year drop, a loss of 8,333 students, is the largest outside the pandemic year that opened this decade of decline.

Fifty-nine districts are now at their lowest enrollment ever recorded in the state's dataset, which begins in 2015-16. That is 38.3% of all districts with multi-year data, and it includes nine of the state's 10 largest. The districts at record lows collectively enroll 78.7% of the state's students. Only Hobbs^↗, the seventh-largest district at 10,002 students, avoided the list among the top 10.

Every major district, the same direction

Albuquerque^↗ has declined every year for a decade. Its 72,573 students in 2025-26 represent a loss of 19,579 from 2015-16, a 21.2% decline. The district now projects fewer than 65,000 students on its internal enrollment estimates, which use a different counting window than the state's 40-day figures.

Las Cruces^↗ is down 2,701 from its 2018-19 peak, a 10.9% loss. Santa Fe^↗ has lost 2,595 students (19.6%) over the same span, declining every year since. Gadsden^↗ has shed 2,350 (17.3%), Roswell^↗ 1,806 (16.9%), and Farmington^↗ 1,380 (11.7%).

Three districts have declined every single year for a decade: Albuquerque, Socorro^↗, and Taos^↗. Santa Fe, Gadsden, and Pojoaque^↗ are on eight-year streaks. No traditional district of any size has been immune.

The Gallup disruption

The largest single-district collapse in 2025-26 belongs to Gallup^↗, which lost 3,342 students in one year, a 26.2% drop from 12,737 to 9,395. This was not a gradual decline. Gallup-McKinley County Schools terminated its contract with virtual learning provider Stride Inc. in May 2025, displacing thousands of online students who had been enrolled through the district's Destinations Career Academy.

The state's Public Education Department later attributed a $35 million budget shortfall to the arrangement, because Gallup continued drawing state funding based on prior-year enrollment for students it no longer served. The state legislature passed an emergency bill to recoup the overpayment.

Without Gallup's virtual school collapse, the statewide drop would have been roughly 5,000, still larger than either the 1,875 loss in 2022-23 or the 4,211 loss in 2024-25. Gallup's situation illustrates how virtual enrollment, counted through a single district, can distort statewide figures in both directions.

The acceleration beneath the surface

Even setting aside the Gallup anomaly, the trend is worsening. The 2023-24 loss of 5,581 students had no such distortion, and it alone dwarfs the 1,300-to-2,700 annual declines that characterized the pre-pandemic years. The state lost 14,323 students in the COVID year of 2020-21, and enrollment has never recovered. New Mexico has declined in 10 of the 11 years in the dataset, with only 2021-22 showing a negligible gain of four students.

The record-low count has jumped. After holding in the range of 43 to 50 districts from 2022 through 2025, it jumped to 59 in 2026, the highest since the COVID year of 2020-21, when 72 districts hit lows.

The demographic undertow

The structural driver is demographic. University of New Mexico population projections estimate the state's 0-to-24 population will decline 20% over 20 years, reaching approximately 550,000 by 2040. Births have fallen steadily since 2008. Deaths now exceed births annually, a reversal that began in 2020 and has persisted. The state's total population peaked near 2.11 million and is projected to begin declining after 2035.

"Our population is experiencing a rapidly changing age structure... declining number of children and emerging adults." — UNM Geospatial and Population Studies, 2024

Domestic out-migration compounds the birth rate decline. New Mexico lost a net 6,000 residents to other states since 2020, partially offset by international migration of about 12,000.

The Rio Grande Foundation has characterized the enrollment decline as among the worst nationally, noting that only California and Hawaii face steeper projected declines. The foundation argues that state investments in universal pre-K and tuition-free college have not stemmed the outflow of young families.

Whether the decline is primarily birth-rate-driven or migration-driven, or some combination, is difficult to disentangle from enrollment data alone. Both mechanisms produce the same pattern: fewer children entering kindergarten, smaller cohorts moving through each grade.

Charters grew, then stalled

The charter sector has been the primary counterweight to traditional district losses. Charter enrollment grew from 13,534 in 2018-19 to 22,242 in 2024-25, nearly doubling its share from 4.0% to 7.3% of statewide enrollment. But in 2025-26, charter enrollment dipped for the first time, falling to 21,734, a loss of 508 students.

Among districts at all-time highs in 2026, 22 of 24 with multi-year data are charter schools. Among those at all-time lows, 50 of 59 are traditional districts. The sector divergence is unmistakable, but it is also reaching a ceiling. The total number of charter entities dropped from 58 to 57 in 2025-26, and several established charters lost students alongside their traditional counterparts.

The small-district squeeze

Of the 59 districts at record lows, 31 enroll fewer than 500 students. These micro-districts, scattered across rural New Mexico from the Sangre de Cristos to the Bootheel, face a compounding problem: each lost student represents a larger share of the budget, and there are fewer remaining programs to consolidate.

Espanola^↗ has lost 30.2% from its peak, falling from 3,555 to 2,480. Las Vegas City^↗ has lost 32.1%. Central^↗ Consolidated, serving a large Native American population in the Four Corners region, has shed 28.4%.

In percentage terms, the hardest-hit mid-sized districts have lost roughly a quarter to a third of their enrollment in seven years. These are not gradual shifts that can be managed through attrition. They represent the closure of grade-level sections, the consolidation of buildings, and the elimination of electives.

Only 17 traditional districts grew between 2018-19 and 2025-26, and most of those gains were modest. Loving^↗ and Tularosa each added 121 students over that span. No traditional district in the state added more than that.

What the next count will reveal

The 300,000 threshold New Mexico crossed in 2025-26 is symbolic, but the fiscal mechanics are not. State Equalization Guarantee funding follows enrollment counts. APS alone faces a $2.5 million SEG reduction from a single year's decline, even as the district approved its largest budget in history at $2.25 billion, driven by rising per-pupil costs.

The Yazzie/Martinez court order found the state was denying at-risk students their constitutional right to a sufficient education. The legislature has responded with $1.6 billion in additional recurring funding since the ruling, a 58% increase. Yet only 38% of students read at grade level. The 59 districts at their smallest ever recorded are being asked to do more with less, or more precisely, to do more with more money for fewer students, a formula that works until it does not.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Explore Academy Grew 612% in a Decade. Then 2026 Happened.

Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Explore Academy^↗ opened in 2014 with a narrow pitch: a high school in Albuquerque where students pick short themed seminars instead of following a fixed course sequence. It enrolled 199 students in the first year the state data covers. A decade later, the flagship campus has 1,418 students, a K-12 grade span, an "A" rating from the Public Education Department, and a 612.6% enrollment increase without a single year of decline. Only three other entities in New Mexico can claim an unbroken growth streak of eight or more years.

The growth story gets more complicated when the lens widens. Explore now operates three campuses across the state: Albuquerque, Las Cruces^↗ (opened 2022), and Rio Rancho^↗ (opened 2023). As a network, it peaked at 2,442 students in 2025. In 2026, the combined enrollment fell to 2,318, a 5.1% decline and the network's first contraction.

A flagship that keeps climbing

The Albuquerque campus has defied every statewide trend. While Albuquerque Public Schools^↗ lost 19,579 students over the same period, a 21.2% decline, Explore ABQ added 1,219. The charter now enrolls 1.95% of APS's total headcount, up from 0.22% in 2016.

The trajectory has two distinct phases. From 2016 to 2018, growth was modest: 13 students, then 46. In 2019, the campus nearly doubled, jumping from 258 to 441. That acceleration continued through the pandemic, when many traditional districts were losing students in droves. Between 2021 and 2022 alone, the ABQ campus gained 380 students, a 58.8% single-year surge. The gains have tapered since then: 178 in 2023, 120 in 2024, 89 in 2025, and just five in 2026. The flagship may be approaching a plateau.

The original campus served grades 9 through 11. By 2024, it had expanded to K-12, with a dedicated elementary campus at Journal Center now listed for sale at $10.95 million. Head administrator Jacob Kolander confirmed expansion plans but said "nothing has been finalized."

The network's uneven geography

The expansion beyond Albuquerque has produced mixed results.

The Las Cruces campus opened in 2022 with 94 students and grew rapidly, reaching 599 by 2025. Then it shed 174 students in a single year, dropping 29.0% to 425 in 2026. The campus underwent charter renewal review in 2025; the Public Education Department's Charter Schools Division recommended a five-year renewal with a math-proficiency condition. Las Cruces Public Schools^↗, the traditional district in that market, also declined, losing 2,809 students since 2016 to reach 22,156.

The Rio Rancho campus opened in August 2023, converting a former Concentrix call center into a K-6 school with class sizes capped at 14 to 16 students. It enrolled 273 students in its first full year and has grown to 475 in 2026, a 74.0% increase. Rio Rancho Public Schools^↗, its host district, has lost 667 students since 2016 and now enrolls 16,245.

The stacked area chart makes the 2026 contraction visible: the Las Cruces wedge shrinks sharply while the Albuquerque base barely moves. The network's growth over the past four years was primarily driven by new campus openings, not by organic expansion of the flagship.

The 2026 reversal in context

The network's first decline does not appear to be an Explore-specific phenomenon. Mission Achievement and Success, New Mexico's largest charter entity at 1,898 students, lost 338 students in 2026, a 15.1% drop. The charter sector as a whole contracted for the first time in the data, falling from 22,242 to 21,734 students while its share of total enrollment held steady at 7.3%.

One possible driver is the maturation of pandemic-era enrollment shifts. Several charters that grew rapidly during 2020-2022, when families sought alternatives to closed or remote traditional schools, may be experiencing a reversion as those students graduate or return to traditional districts. The Las Cruces campus's 29% single-year decline is harder to explain by maturation alone. It may reflect growing pains specific to a young campus still building community roots in a smaller market than Albuquerque.

Where Explore fits in the charter landscape

Even after the 2026 decline, the Explore network accounts for 10.7% of all charter enrollment in New Mexico. The ABQ campus alone is the state's fourth-largest charter entity.

The top tier of New Mexico charters is dominated by brick-and-mortar schools with distinctive instructional models. Mission Achievement and Success (1,898) runs extended-day schedules. Pecos Cyber Academy (1,616) and NM Connections Academy (1,508) are virtual. Explore's "flavored" curriculum, where students choose themed seminars that rotate every six weeks, occupies a niche between traditional instruction and online learning.

Since 2019, Explore ABQ has added more students in absolute terms (+977) than any other charter entity in the state. Hozho Academy (+729, a 592.7% increase) and ABQ School of Excellence (+415) are the next-largest growers.

A demographic profile unlike the state

Explore Academy's student body does not mirror New Mexico. In 2019, when the network was a single Albuquerque campus, 51.0% of students were white and 37.0% were Hispanic. By 2026, that had shifted: 33.9% white, 56.0% Hispanic. The network's demographics have moved toward the state average but remain significantly whiter. New Mexico's public school enrollment is 64.6% Hispanic and 19.6% white.

The demographic gap was a central concern when Explore attempted to open a Santa Fe campus in 2023. The Public Education Department's Charter Schools Division noted that the application projected 30% white students, double the 15% rate at Santa Fe Public Schools, and questioned the school's decision not to offer bilingual instruction. The application was withdrawn before a final vote. A new notice of intent for a Santa Fe campus was filed with the Public Education Commission in late 2024.

Separately, the network's special education enrollment has grown faster than total enrollment. In 2019, 9.3% of Explore students received special education services (41 of 441). By 2026, that rate was 15.7% (365 of 2,318), closer to the statewide rate and a sign that the school is serving a broader cross-section of student needs than in its early years.

What 2027 will test

The question facing Explore Academy is whether its model can sustain itself at scale across multiple markets. The ABQ flagship gained just five students in 2026. The K-5 campus is for sale. Las Cruces lost nearly a third of its enrollment. Rio Rancho is still growing, but from a small base and with a grade span that has not yet reached middle school age.

The network has also signaled ambitions beyond New Mexico. Explore Academy campuses now operate in Las Vegas and Peoria, Arizona, making it a multi-state charter operator. Whether the New Mexico network can hold 2,300 students while the organization's attention spreads across state lines will be the enrollment story to watch in 2027.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

One in Six New Mexico Students Is an English Learner

Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT

New Mexico lost 36,778 students between 2019 and 2026, an 11% decline that touched nearly every district in the state. English learner enrollment moved in the opposite direction. The state counted 53,149 ELL students in 2025-26, up 2,197 from 50,952 seven years earlier. That 4.3% gain against an 11% total loss produced a 15.3 percentage point divergence: the students learning English grew while the system around them shrank.

The gap is not abstract. It means 33 districts now have English learner shares above 20%. It means Hatch Valley^↗, a small district on the southern border, enrolls more ELL students than non-ELL. It means Carlsbad^↗, deep in Permian Basin oil country, saw its ELL population more than double in six years. And it means New Mexico's $4.4 billion K-12 system faces a structural mismatch: declining headcounts that reduce per-pupil funding and rising service demands that increase per-pupil costs.

The divergence in numbers

Between 2019 and 2026, non-ELL enrollment fell by 38,975 students, a 13.7% decline. ELL enrollment added 2,197 students. The effect on share was steady: English learners rose from 15.2% of total enrollment in 2019 to a peak of 18.2% in 2024-25, before dipping slightly to 17.8% in 2025-26.

That trajectory puts New Mexico well above the national average. Nationally, about 10.6% of public school students were English learners as of fall 2021, the most recent federal figure. New Mexico's 17.8% rate is nearly double that.

The year-over-year pattern reveals two distinct phases. From 2021 through 2023, ELL enrollment surged, adding 4,252 students in 2022 alone, a post-COVID rebound that exceeded the pre-pandemic baseline. Growth then plateaued: the 2025 count of 55,798 was only 83 students above 2023. In 2026, the trend reversed. ELL enrollment fell by 2,649 students, a 4.7% drop, the largest single-year decline in the dataset.

Where the growth is coming from

ELL enrollment can rise for two distinct reasons: new students arriving who speak a language other than English, or existing students being identified as English learners through screening. The data cannot distinguish between the two, but geographic patterns offer clues.

The strongest ELL growth is concentrated in southeastern New Mexico's Permian Basin, where oil and gas extraction has drawn thousands of immigrant workers and their families. Carlsbad^↗ went from 595 ELL students in 2019 (7.4% of enrollment) to 1,337 in 2026 (17.8%), a 125% increase. Hobbs^↗ grew from 1,889 to 2,347, a 24% gain that pushed its ELL share to 23.5%. Lovington^↗ rose from 933 to 1,030, reaching 31.2%.

This pattern is consistent with arrival-driven growth. The Permian Basin has experienced sustained labor migration, particularly from Mexico and Central America, as oil production expanded. In Lea County, where Hobbs and Lovington are located, Hispanics and Latinos now account for as much as 70% of the population, compared with 40% two decades ago.

The border region tells a different story. Gadsden^↗, Deming^↗, and Hatch Valley^↗ have always had high ELL concentrations, reflecting longstanding cross-border communities. Hatch Valley's share rose from 43.5% to 52.3%, but its absolute ELL count grew by just 25 students. The share increase is largely a denominator effect: total enrollment fell while ELL enrollment held steady.

Improved identification may also be at work. The 2018 Yazzie/Martinez ruling found that New Mexico had failed to meet its obligations to English learners under the Bilingual Multicultural Education Act and federal civil rights requirements. The court ordered the state to address these failures, and subsequent reforms expanded screening and identification efforts. Districts that had previously under-identified ELL students may have begun counting them more systematically, inflating apparent growth.

Both forces are probably at work. Oil country growth is primarily arrival-driven. The statewide share increase, particularly in districts without obvious immigration drivers, likely reflects expanded screening.

The funding equation

New Mexico's legislature recognized the structural tension in 2025. HB 63, signed into law that year, creates a standalone English Learner Program Unit in the state's funding formula. Previously, ELL students were bundled into the broader "at-risk" funding category, diluting resources among multiple populations with different needs.

"By having it as its own category, I feel that this will help to ensure that we're being equitable." — Michael Rodriguez, executive director of Dual Language Education of New Mexico, quoted in the Los Alamos Daily Post

The new formula uses a three-year average ELL rate multiplied by a 0.33 factor to generate additional program units. For districts like Hatch Valley and Deming, where more than four in ten students are English learners, the standalone multiplier could deliver meaningful new revenue. For districts like Rio Rancho^↗, where ELL share is 5.8%, the impact will be smaller.

But funding is only half the constraint. The state faces a bilingual teacher retention problem. A Legislative Finance Committee program evaluation found 4,055 teachers in New Mexico hold bilingual endorsements, but only about 20% actually teach in bilingual programs. The gap is not supply but willingness: bilingual-endorsed teachers report being asked to translate materials and interpret at meetings without additional compensation, creating a disincentive to work in the programs that need them most.

Where concentration is highest

Thirty-three districts had ELL shares above 20% in 2025-26. The geography splits into three clusters.

The border corridor, from Gadsden (42.4%) through Deming (44.0%) to Hatch Valley (52.3%), has maintained high ELL shares for decades. These are communities where Spanish is the predominant home language and cross-border enrollment is common.

The Permian Basin, including Hobbs (23.5%), Lovington (31.2%), and Carlsbad (17.8%), represents the fastest growth. Carlsbad's ELL share was 7.4% in 2019. It has more than doubled.

Albuquerque^↗ anchors the system. With 14,624 ELL students, it accounts for 27.5% of the state's entire ELL population. Its ELL share crossed 20% in 2024-25 and held at 20.2% in 2025-26. One in five APS students is an English learner.

The 2026 reversal

The 2,649-student ELL decline in 2026 broke a four-year growth streak and deserves scrutiny. Albuquerque alone lost 841 ELL students, accounting for nearly a third of the statewide drop. Gallup^↗ lost 477. Gadsden lost 355. Las Cruces^↗ lost 315.

Several explanations are plausible. Reclassification: students who reached proficiency thresholds on the ACCESS assessment exited ELL status, and the exit cohort exceeded the entry cohort for the first time since the pandemic. Immigration enforcement: increased federal enforcement activity in 2025-26 may have deterred enrollment among immigrant families. Total enrollment decline: a shrinking denominator means fewer new kindergartners entering the pipeline, including fewer who qualify as ELL.

The data cannot isolate a single cause. What it does show is that ELL growth in New Mexico is not a one-way escalator. The 2021 COVID dip and the 2026 reversal both demonstrate that external forces, from pandemic disruption to federal policy, can shift the trajectory sharply in a single year.

A system built for decline, serving growth

New Mexico's education system is shrinking. Total enrollment has fallen nearly every year since 2019 and now sits at 298,353, its lowest point in the data. The state lost 36,778 students in seven years. Within that contraction, English learner enrollment grew by 2,197, special education enrollment grew by 7,779 (to 20.5% of all students), and the instructional programs these students receive carry higher per-pupil costs than general education.

The budget pressure is direct. Declining headcounts reduce total funding. Rising shares of students in specialized programs increase average costs. HB 63 begins to address the ELL piece, but whether new formula units translate into bilingual classrooms, trained teachers, and effective programming depends on districts' ability to recruit and retain bilingual educators, something the state has struggled with for years.

Hatch Valley now has more English learners than non-English learners. Carlsbad's ELL population more than doubled in six years. In Hobbs, nearly one in four students is learning English. These are not districts that can wait for policy to catch up. They need bilingual teachers now, in buildings that are losing general education students, in a state where 80% of bilingual-endorsed teachers do not teach in bilingual programs. The 53,149 English learners enrolled in 2025-26 are not going anywhere. The system around them keeps shrinking.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Fewer Than One in Five

Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT

New Mexico has never been a majority-white state. But it has now crossed a threshold that would have seemed improbable even a decade ago: white students represent just 19.6% of public school enrollment, the first time the share has fallen below one in five. The 58,393 white students enrolled in 2025-26 are 20,424 fewer than the 78,817 enrolled in 2018-19, a 25.9% decline. Over the same period, total enrollment fell 11.0%. White families are leaving New Mexico's public schools at more than twice the overall rate.

This is not a single-year anomaly. White enrollment has declined in every year of available data, dropping from 23.5% in 2019 to 19.6% in 2026. The decline continued through COVID, through a brief enrollment plateau in 2021-22, and through the introduction of a new multiracial category that reclassified some previously white-counted students. Even controlling for that reclassification, the trajectory is unambiguous.

A 3.9-point slide in seven years

White enrollment fell every year from 2019 to 2026. The steepest single-year drop came during COVID: 7,508 white students vanished between 2019-20 and 2020-21, a 9.7% loss in a single year. That year alone erased a decade's worth of typical attrition. The count stabilized briefly in 2021-22 (losing just 177 students) before resuming losses of 2,000 to 6,000 per year.

The share decline, from 23.5% to 19.6%, amounts to 3.9 percentage points. To put that in context: Hispanic students, who make up nearly two-thirds of enrollment, saw their share rise 2.8 points over the same period (61.8% to 64.6%) despite also losing students in absolute terms. Hispanic enrollment fell by 14,172 students, a 6.8% decline. Native American enrollment fell by 5,432 students, a 15.6% decline, dropping from 10.4% to 9.9% of the total.

In short, every major racial group is shrinking in absolute numbers. White enrollment is shrinking fastest.

The 55% problem

White students made up 19.6% of enrollment in 2026 but accounted for 55.5% of total enrollment losses since 2019. That ratio, nearly three to one, means white attrition is the single largest driver of New Mexico's overall enrollment decline even though white students are a relatively small share of the student body.

One caveat matters here. In 2025, New Mexico's Public Education Department began reporting a multiracial category for the first time, and 7,221 students appeared in it immediately. By 2026, the count was 7,441. Prior to 2025, the multiracial category did not exist in the data, meaning these students were previously counted under other race categories, likely including white. Some portion of the apparent 2023-to-2025 white decline (5,809 students) reflects reclassification rather than actual departures.

The pre-reclassification period tells a cleaner story. From 2019 to 2023, before the multiracial category existed, white enrollment fell from 78,817 to 67,154, a loss of 11,663 students (14.8%). That decline cannot be attributed to a reporting change.

Where the losses concentrate

Albuquerque^↗ Public Schools alone lost 6,078 white students since 2019, accounting for 29.8% of the statewide white loss. APS white enrollment fell from 19,723 to 13,645, a 30.8% decline. The district's white share dropped from 21.9% to 18.8%.

Rio Rancho^↗, the state's second-largest suburban district, lost 1,690 white students (29.0%), with its white share falling from 33.2% to 25.5%. Las Cruces^↗ lost 1,439 (30.1%). Alamogordo^↗, a military-adjacent district, lost 1,152 white students, a 38.1% decline that dropped its white share from 47.3% to 36.3%.

The pattern is uniform: among districts with more than 2,000 students, every single one lost white enrollment. The percentage declines range from 6.8% (Gadsden, where white students were already a small fraction) to 38.1% (Alamogordo). No large district bucked the trend.

The charter gap

Charter schools in New Mexico are substantially whiter than traditional districts. In 2026, charters enrolled students who were 24.3% white, compared with 19.2% in traditional districts, a 5.1 percentage-point gap. In 2019 the gap was wider: 31.3% versus 23.2%.

Both sectors lost white share, but charters held on to a larger proportion of their white students. Charter white enrollment grew from 4,231 to 5,292 between 2019 and 2026, even as traditional district white enrollment fell from 74,586 to 53,062. White families moving into the charter sector partially offset what would otherwise be an even steeper traditional-district decline.

What is driving this

Three forces are plausibly at work, and the data cannot cleanly separate them.

The strongest evidence points to demographics. New Mexico's births have been declining steadily since 2007, when the state's total fertility rate was 2,308 per 1,000 women of reproductive age. By 2024, that rate had fallen to 1,562. White births represent a smaller share of the state's births (25.8%, per March of Dimes PeriStats data for 2021-2023) than white students represent of current enrollment (19.6%). That 6.2 percentage-point gap between the birth share and the enrollment share suggests that the pipeline of white kindergarteners entering public schools is smaller than the pipeline of white 12th graders leaving, but also that white families are more likely to opt out of public schools altogether.

Outmigration adds a second layer. New Mexico has run a negative domestic migration balance every year since 2012, meaning more residents leave for other states than arrive from them. Robert Rhatigan, the state demographer at the University of New Mexico, told the Santa Fe New Mexican that the state is now dependent on migration for growth because "New Mexico now sees more deaths than births each year." Census estimates show 2,267 residents left the state on net in the most recent year. The Census Bureau does not publish outmigration by race at the state level, so the degree to which white families are overrepresented among those leaving is unknown.

"Births have been in a slow steady decline since 2008 with women having fewer children each year. This trend should continue not only because women are having less children, but also because we have less women of childbearing age every year." -- Dr. Jacqueline Miller, UNM Geospatial and Population Studies

A third factor is school choice. White students are overrepresented in New Mexico's charter sector (24.3% white versus 19.2% in traditional districts). No statewide data tracks enrollment in private schools by race, so the full scope of white families choosing alternatives to traditional public schools remains unquantifiable. The Rio Grande Foundation has argued that New Mexico's enrollment decline reflects broader dissatisfaction with the state's education system, though this argument applies to all racial groups, not specifically white families.

The 20 holdouts

Only 20 districts in New Mexico had a white-majority student body in 2026. The largest was Los Alamos^↗, the scientific laboratory community, at 51.8% white with 1,826 white students. The next largest was 21st Century Public Academy, a charter school with 339 students (92.6% white). After that, every white-majority district enrolled fewer than 300 students. Cloudcroft^↗ (66.7% white, 254 students), Melrose (70.6%, 192 students), Dora (73.2%, 150 students): these are small rural communities, not population centers.

In districts enrolling more than 2,000 students, the aggregate white share was 18.8%, even lower than the statewide figure. The white student population in New Mexico is increasingly dispersed across districts where it is a small and shrinking minority.

Below 15% by 2035

UNM population researchers project that New Mexico's youth population (ages 0-24) will decline 20% over the next 20 years, driven by falling fertility and persistent domestic outmigration. The white share of that declining youth population will almost certainly continue to fall, given the gap between white births (25.8% of all births) and white enrollment (19.6%). At the current pace of share decline, roughly 0.6 percentage points per year, white enrollment would drop below 15% before 2035.

Charter white enrollment grew by 1,061 students since 2019 while traditional districts lost 21,524. That means roughly 95% of white attrition is not showing up anywhere in the public system. Some of those families moved to Texas or Colorado. Some switched to private school or homeschooling. Some aged out without younger siblings to replace them. The enrollment data tracks departure, not destination. What it does show is a public school system that will look, within a decade, almost nothing like the one that existed when most of its buildings were built.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Six Years After COVID, 93 Districts Still Haven't Recovered

Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT

The pandemic was supposed to be a temporary shock. Albuquerque^↗ lost 6,684 students between 2019 and 2021, an extraordinary loss for any two-year period. But the five years since have been worse: APS shed another 10,983 students after schools fully reopened, bringing the district to 72,573, a 19.6% decline from its 2019 enrollment. The COVID crater, it turns out, was just the first drop on a much longer fall.

New Mexico enrolled 298,353 students in 2025-26, down 36,778 from its 2019 total of 335,131. That is an 11.0% decline in seven years. The state has not recovered a single net student since the pandemic. It has lost more.

The gap that kept growing

The state was already declining before COVID. Between 2016 and 2019, New Mexico lost 4,482 students, about 1,500 per year. Then the pandemic hit, and enrollment fell by 14,323 in a single year (2020-21), the largest one-year drop in the dataset.

What followed was not recovery. In 2021-22, the state added four students statewide. Four. Then the losses resumed: 1,875 in 2022-23, 5,581 in 2023-24, 4,211 in 2024-25, and 8,333 in 2025-26. The post-COVID losses (19,996 students since 2021) now exceed the pandemic-era losses (16,782 students from 2019 to 2021) by 19%.

Only 43 of 136 districts (31.6%) have returned to their 2019 enrollment levels. That rate has declined steadily: in 2020, 51.1% of districts were above their 2019 mark. By 2023, it was 34.8%. By 2026, it fell to 31.6%. Each year, a few more districts slip below their pre-COVID line and do not come back.

The weight falls on a few shoulders

Statewide losses are concentrated to a degree that is unusual even among declining states. Five districts account for 74.4% of the total gap: Albuquerque (-17,667), Las Cruces^↗ (-2,701), Santa Fe^↗ (-2,595), Gadsden^↗ (-2,350), and Gallup^↗ (-2,053). APS alone accounts for 48.0% of the state's entire loss.

APS's trajectory has no inflection point. The district enrolled 90,240 students in 2019, and has declined every year since: 89,543, then 83,556, 82,321, 80,362, 76,870, 75,040, and now 72,573. At its current pace, APS will enroll fewer than 65,000 students within three years of a district that held 92,152 a decade ago. City Desk ABQ reported in 2024 that the enrollment variance in 2023-24 resulted in a $2.5 million reduction in State Equalization Guarantee revenue from the state.

The size gradient is severe. Not a single district enrolling more than 2,000 students in 2019 has recovered to its pre-COVID level. Zero of nine large districts (10,000+). Zero of 20 mid-size districts (2,000-10,000). Recovery is limited to smaller entities: 36.7% of districts between 500 and 2,000 students, and 40.0% of districts under 500.

Where the students went

For most districts, COVID was not the cause. It was the accelerant. The post-pandemic period has been worse than the pandemic itself for 49 of 134 districts (excluding Santa Rosa and Chama Valley, which show counting methodology changes).

The New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee identified the underlying mechanics in a 2021 policy spotlight: the state's birth rate fell 19% between 2010 and 2019, producing 16.4% fewer young children than a decade prior. That translates to roughly 5,900 fewer births per year flowing into the school system. At the same time, the working-age population declined 2% while the over-65 population grew 38%. New Mexico's 2.8% total population growth from 2010 to 2020 was driven almost entirely by aging, not by families.

"Our population is aging, which contributes to lower fertility in the state overall and school enrollment has declined in large part because our child population has declined." -- Jacqueline Miller, UNM Geospatial and Population Studies, KSFR, Sept. 2022

The LFC report found that 43% of families whose students disenrolled during the 2020-21 school year cited moving out of state as the reason. New Mexico took one of the nation's most aggressive approaches to COVID-19 school closures, ordering schools closed on March 16, 2020 and not authorizing full-time in-person return until April 2021, more than a year later. During that period, LFC staff heard "numerous anecdotal accounts of parents moving out of state to enroll their children in neighboring state schools." The LFC estimated only 55% of students who disenrolled during 2021 were likely to return.

The remaining disenrollment breaks down among homeschooling (17.4%), re-enrollment in a private or charter school (14.4%), and students dropped for non-attendance (12.0%), according to the NM Public Education Department survey cited in the LFC report.

The charter divide

Charter schools occupy a separate universe in the recovery data. Among charters, 23 of 43 (53.5%) have recovered to 2019 levels. Among traditional districts, only 18 of 91 (19.8%) have.

The gap goes beyond recovery rates. The traditional sector lost 47,277 students between 2019 and 2026; the charter sector gained 3,172. Explore Academy^↗ grew from 441 to 1,418 students. Mission Achievement and Success^↗ went from 1,167 to 1,898. Hozho Academy^↗ expanded from 123 to 852. These are not districts recovering lost ground. They are schools that grew through the pandemic and kept growing.

Part of the charter recovery advantage reflects size: most charters are small enough to fall into the categories where recovery is more common. But sector identity matters beyond size. Traditional districts under 500 students recovered at 40.0%, while charters of all sizes recovered at 53.5%.

That growth does not offset the traditional losses. Charter enrollment statewide totals 15,753, less than one-fifth of the 47,277 lost by traditional districts. The charter sector is growing, but it is absorbing a fraction of the students leaving, not replacing them. Most of the decline reflects students who left the state's public system entirely.

Espanola^↗ and the rural collapse

The percentage declines in smaller districts are more severe than the headline numbers from Albuquerque. Espanola lost 30.2% of its enrollment since 2019, falling from 3,555 to 2,480. Central^↗ Consolidated dropped 28.4%, from 5,893 to 4,219. Las Vegas City^↗ declined 32.1%, from 1,512 to 1,026. These are districts where losing 500 students means losing an entire elementary school's worth of enrollment and the staffing allocation that comes with it.

Gallup presents a special case. The district actually gained students during the pandemic (from 11,448 in 2019 to 12,418 in 2021), one of the few large districts to do so. But in 2025-26, Gallup dropped to 9,395, a loss of 3,023 from its 2021 level. The 2026 figure represents a restructuring event that warrants further investigation.

Farmington^↗ lost 1,380 students (11.7%), and Rio Rancho^↗ lost 1,318 (7.5%), suggesting that the decline extends beyond the urban core and the poorest rural districts into the state's suburban and mid-size communities.

The bottom is not in sight

New Mexico's public school enrollment has not reached bottom. The state's birth rate, already 19% below its 2010 level, continued to decline after the pandemic. The LFC projected in 2021 that the number of high school graduates would fall 22% by 2037. The 0-to-14 age group is projected to shrink by 10.2% between 2020 and 2040, according to UNM Geospatial and Population Studies projections cited in the LFC report.

The 2025-26 loss of 8,333 students is the second-largest single-year decline in the dataset, behind only the pandemic year of 2020-21. If the state loses students at even half that pace, enrollment will fall below 280,000 within four years, a level not seen since the early 2000s.

The budget hit is direct. At approximately $11,000 per pupil in state funding, the 36,778-student gap since 2019 represents over $400 million in annual revenue that no longer flows to district budgets. APS CFO Renette Apodaca told NM Education that the district is "currently identifying essential areas that require funding and exploring alternative funding sources for key initiatives." Despite enrollment falling by more than 20,000 since 2016, APS approved a budget of almost $2.2 billion for 2024-25, its largest ever. That budget assumed a 2% enrollment decline. The actual decline was 3.3%. Every percentage point of miss costs roughly $2.5 million in state formula funding that has already been spent.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Espanola Has Lost More Than a Third of Its Students

Thu, 05 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In 2015-16, Espanola^↗ Public Schools enrolled 3,955 students. By 2025-26, that number had fallen to 2,480, a loss of 1,475 students and 37.3% of the district's enrollment. Among New Mexico districts that started the decade with at least 500 students, only Las Vegas City^↗ declined faster. Espanola's rate of decline is more than three times the statewide average of 12.1%.

The district has lost students in each of the past 10 years. What looked like a floor at 3,040 students in 2022-23 turned out to be a ledge: the district dropped 226 students in 2023-24, then another 150 in 2024-25, then 184 in 2025-26. The first of those three declines accounted for about 4.0% of New Mexico's statewide loss that year.

The steepest fall in northern New Mexico

Espanola sits at the center of a region where every district is shrinking, but no peer is shrinking at anything close to this pace. Taos^↗ lost 26.2% over the same period. Pojoaque^↗, which draws from overlapping communities in Rio Arriba and Santa Fe counties, lost 24.0%. Santa Fe^↗, the regional anchor, lost 20.9%. Los Alamos^↗, 35 miles southeast and insulated by a federal laboratory economy, lost just 1.5%.

The gap between Espanola and its closest regional peer is 11 percentage points. Among all 13 New Mexico districts that enrolled between 2,500 and 5,500 students in 2015-16, Espanola's 37.3% decline is about seven percentage points worse than Silver City^↗, the next-fastest decliner at 30.2%.

Ten losses in 10 years

The year-over-year pattern reveals a decline that never meaningfully paused. From 2016-17 through 2025-26, Espanola posted 10 consecutive years of losses. The tempo varied: losses of 159 and 158 students bookended a milder stretch in 2017-18 (-83), then the pandemic years brought back-to-back losses exceeding 200 students. The brief deceleration to -31 in 2022-23 was followed by three straight larger declines.

The 2023-24 drop deserves scrutiny, but the pattern no longer looks like a one-year artifact. In the updated subgroup snapshot, Espanola declined in three consecutive years: -226 in 2023-24, -150 in 2024-25, and -184 in 2025-26.

A district under emergency

Espanola's enrollment losses do not exist in isolation. They track a community under compounding pressure from population decline, poverty, and a substance abuse crisis that has drawn statewide emergency action.

Rio Arriba County, where the district is headquartered, has been losing residents since 2010. Census estimates place the county's population at roughly 40,000, down from 40,286 in 2010, with over 20% of residents living in poverty.

The most visible crisis is fentanyl. Rio Arriba County recorded 50 drug overdose deaths in the year ending June 2022, a rate of 123.8 per 100,000 residents, nearly double Santa Fe County's rate and the highest in northern New Mexico. In August 2025, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham declared a state of emergency for the county, citing violent crime, drug trafficking, and rising homelessness.

"The surge in criminal activity has contributed to increased homelessness, family instability and fatal drug overdoses." — Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, August 2025

Family instability, the governor's phrase, is a euphemism that maps directly onto enrollment. Parents who lose custody, families who double up or move in with relatives in other districts, households that relocate to escape a drug-saturated environment: all of these pull children out of Espanola's schools. No enrollment dataset can isolate the drug crisis as a cause, but the geographic and temporal overlap is hard to ignore in a county where the overdose death rate has been among the nation's highest for years.

A separate contributing factor is the regional pull of charter schools. Santa Fe, 25 miles to the south, has a well-established charter sector that has drawn families away from traditional public schools for over two decades. No Espanola-specific transfer data isolates how many families are choosing Santa Fe charters, but the option exists for families along the US-285 corridor, and Espanola's declining performance ratings give them reason to look.

School closures on the table

The enrollment losses have forced the district into a conversation about its physical footprint. In mid-2024, the Espanola school board unveiled a boundary study and floated the closure of Dixon, Hernandez, and Velarde elementary schools, citing a 30%-plus enrollment decline and the high costs of maintaining small, rural campuses.

The proposal met immediate resistance. Nearly 100 Dixon community members gathered in August 2024 to argue that their school's small size and tight-knit community were strengths, not liabilities. The board postponed action, with its president stating the board had no near-term plans to close any schools without proper community input. As of early 2026, no closures have been executed, but the fiscal arithmetic has only gotten worse: the district now enrolls 2,480 students across what U.S. News lists as 13 schools.

Shifting composition as the district shrinks

As Espanola's total enrollment fell, its demographic composition shifted. The district was already overwhelmingly Hispanic, at 87.8% in 2018-19. By 2025-26, that share had risen to 90.6%, as Hispanic enrollment fell less steeply than other groups in absolute terms.

The more striking shift is among English learners. In 2018-19, 573 students, or 16.1% of enrollment, were classified as EL. By 2025-26, the EL count had declined modestly to 597, but the share had risen to 24.1%, an 8 percentage point increase. Nearly one in four Espanola students now receives English learner services.

Whether this rising share reflects new identification of existing students, changes in classification criteria, or the arrival of families with greater language-service needs is not distinguishable from the enrollment data alone. What is clear is the operational consequence: a district that is both shrinking and seeing its EL share climb by half faces a structural mismatch between declining base enrollment and growing demand for specialized bilingual instruction.

Separately, special education enrollment has held relatively steady in absolute terms (514 students in 2018-19, 456 in 2025-26) while rising as a share from 14.5% to 18.4%. Both trends point toward higher per-pupil instructional costs at the same time that per-pupil funding follows a smaller headcount.

Thirteen schools for 2,480 students

New Mexico's state equalization guarantee distributes funding based on enrollment counts, adjusted for factors including at-risk students and small-school size. Espanola's trajectory puts it on a path to cross below 2,000 students within a few years if losses continue at recent rates. That threshold matters less as a round number than as a signal of a district approaching the scale where maintaining a full K-12 program across multiple campuses becomes structurally difficult.

The school closure question, deferred in 2024, will return. Dixon Elementary served 49 students last year. Hernandez served fewer. A district running 13 schools for 2,480 students is spending money on roofs and boilers that could go to classrooms. The 100 Dixon parents who rallied in August 2024 to save their school made a case about community. The budget will make a different one.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Charter Growth Stalls After Seven-Year Run

Thu, 29 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT

For seven consecutive years, New Mexico's charter sector grew while traditional districts shrank. In 2025-26, that streak ended. Charter enrollment fell by 508 students, a 2.3% decline, the first contraction in the data going back to 2019. The drop is modest in absolute terms, but it breaks a pattern that had nearly doubled the sector since the pandemic began: from 13,534 students in 2019 to a peak of 22,242 in 2025.

The reversal does not mean charters and traditional districts now face the same pressures. Traditional enrollment fell by 7,825 students in the same year, 2.8% of its base. Charters still account for just 6.1% of the state's total enrollment decline. But the sector's immunity to the demographic forces draining New Mexico's schools, which lose roughly 4,000 to 8,000 students per year, appears to have expired.

Two schools, half the story

The contraction is not a sector-wide phenomenon. It is concentrated in two charter networks whose losses account for the bulk of the decline.

Mission Achievement and Success^↗, the state's largest charter operator with campuses in Albuquerque, dropped from 2,236 students to 1,898, a loss of 338 students (15.1%). That single operator accounts for two-thirds of the sector's net decline. MAS had been on a growth trajectory since 2019, when it enrolled 1,167 students, more than tripling its 2024 count by adding campuses and grade levels. Its 2026 contraction reversed three years of gains in a single year.

Explore Academy Las Cruces^↗ lost 174 students (29.0%), falling from 599 to 425. The Las Cruces campus closed its high school in June 2025 after just two years of operation, consolidating to a K-8 model. The school's board voted 5-0 to shut the high school division after facing a projected $659,000 deficit, with the alternative being full closure by December 2025, according to the Las Cruces Bulletin.

Together, MAS and Explore Academy Las Cruces account for 512 of the sector's 508-student net decline. Absent those two, the remaining 53 charters in both years essentially broke even.

The funding formula factor

New Mexico's 2025 funding formula overhaul, HB 63, restructured how charter schools receive at-risk student funding. The bill tied state support to each charter's own enrollment of economically disadvantaged students and English learners, rather than to the rate of the local district where the charter operates.

For charters serving high concentrations of at-risk students, this was a windfall. MAS was initially projected to receive nearly $2 million more, the Santa Fe New Mexican reported, though actual gains were smaller because enrollment came in below projections. For charters serving fewer at-risk students, the formula shift hit hard. Explore Academy's Albuquerque flagship lost just over $2 million of a $19.7 million operating budget; its Las Cruces campus lost $1.5 million from a $9 million budget, most of it attributable to the enrollment shortfall that precipitated the high school closure.

The formula change created a structural incentive for charters to enroll at-risk populations, and a structural penalty for those that do not. Whether this contributed to the enrollment shifts visible in the data is difficult to disentangle from the demographic headwinds affecting all New Mexico schools.

A reclassification, not a closure

One charter school that appears to have "vanished" from the 2026 charter rolls is the Albuquerque Institute of Math and Science (AIMS), which enrolled 311 students as a state-chartered school in 2025. AIMS does not appear in the 2026 charter data. However, the school continues to operate: it shows up in 2026 enrollment records as a campus under Albuquerque Public Schools with 324 students, and it announced a new campus partnership with Central New Mexico Community College in 2025. The school was reclassified from charter to district authorization, not closed. This reclassification accounts for roughly 311 of the 508-student raw decline. Adjusting for it, the organic enrollment loss across charters that remained in the sector was approximately 197 students.

Brick-and-mortar charters contract; virtual charters do not

The decline is entirely a brick-and-mortar phenomenon. New Mexico's two virtual charter operators, Pecos Cyber Academy and New Mexico Connections Academy, together enrolled 3,124 students in 2026, up 68 from the prior year. Virtual charters now account for 14.4% of all charter enrollment, up from 7.6% in 2019.

Brick-and-mortar charters, by contrast, fell from 19,186 to 18,610, a loss of 576 students. This tracks with the broader pattern visible in traditional districts: physical schools are losing students to a combination of declining birth cohorts, out-migration, and competition from virtual alternatives.

Growth that was already decelerating

The 2026 reversal did not arrive without warning. Charter growth rates had been slowing for three years: from +14.5% in 2023 to +9.3% in 2024 to +3.6% in 2025. The sector added 2,494 students in 2023 but only 775 in 2025. The curve was flattening well before it turned negative.

The number of charter entities also peaked. New Mexico had 58 charter districts in 2024 and 2025; it has 57 in 2026. The sector added 12 entities between 2019 and 2024, an average of more than two per year. In the last two years, none were added and one (AIMS) was reclassified out.

Losing students, gaining share

Despite losing students, charters' share of total public enrollment actually ticked up, from 7.25% to 7.28%. The math: traditional districts lost students faster (2.8%) than charters did (2.3%), so the charter slice of a shrinking pie grew marginally.

This is a pattern worth watching. A sector can lose students and gain market share simultaneously when the overall system is contracting. It means the charter share number alone is not a reliable indicator of sector health. The question is whether families are choosing charters at higher rates, or whether charters are simply declining more slowly than the districts they draw from.

Bright spots amid the contraction

Not all charters contracted. Solare Collegiate Charter School^↗ added 123 students, growing 39.2% from 314 to 437. Hozho Academy gained 71 students (9.1%). ABQ School of Excellence added 68 (6.8%). Cottonwood Classical Prep grew by 65 (7.6%). Twenty-five of the 55 charters present in both years gained enrollment.

These gains point to continued demand for certain charter models, particularly in Albuquerque's metro area. The growth, however, was not enough to offset the losses concentrated at the top.

A $52.8 million bet on expansion

The federal government awarded Public Charter Schools of New Mexico a $52.8 million Charter School Program grant in 2023 to fund 28 subgrants for new and expanding charters over five years. Executive Director Matt Pahl said the grant aims to generate 7,500 new seats, with priority for communities without existing charter options.

New Mexico is projected to see enrollment declines far exceeding the national average as birth cohorts shrink. The charter sector spent seven years growing against that current. In 2025-26, the current won. The $52.8 million grant will fund new seats. Whether families show up to fill them depends on forces no grant can control: how many children are born in New Mexico, how many families stay, and whether charters can keep growing in a state that keeps getting smaller.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

New Mexico's 2026 Enrollment Drop Is the Second-Largest on Record

Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT

Last year, New Mexico's enrollment appeared to be stabilizing. The state lost 4,211 students in 2024-25, a fraction of the COVID-era crash, and superintendents could reasonably hope the worst had passed. It had not. In 2025-26, the state lost 8,333 students, about twice the prior year's decline, dropping total public school enrollment to 298,353. New Mexico has fallen below 300,000 students for the first time in at least a decade.

The loss is the second-largest single-year decline on record, behind only the pandemic crash of 2020-21, which erased 14,323 students in one year. But unlike the COVID drop, which had a clear external cause and prompted a partial rebound, the 2026 cliff arrived without a triggering event. It is the product of compounding structural forces that have now cost the state 41,260 students, a 12.1% decline, since enrollment peaked at 339,613 in 2015-16.

A year of false calm

The 2025 numbers had offered a misleading signal. After losing 5,581 students in 2023-24, the apparent deceleration to -4,211 in 2024-25 suggested New Mexico might settle into the slow bleed that characterized the pre-COVID era, when the state lost an average of 1,735 students per year. Instead, the 2026 data revealed a post-COVID enrollment regime that is running 2.3 times faster than the old normal: since 2021-22, New Mexico has lost an average of 3,999 students per year.

The four-year period from 2022-23 through 2025-26 accounts for 20,000 lost students, nearly half the state's total decline since 2016.

The Gallup distortion

One district explains 40% of the statewide loss, and the story behind it is not about demographics. Gallup-McKinley County Schools^↗ lost 3,342 students in a single year, a 26.2% drop, after the district's board voted in May 2025 to terminate its contract with Stride, Inc. (formerly K12), a publicly traded virtual education provider. The cancellation displaced roughly 3,000 students statewide who had been enrolled in the district's online program.

Those students did not vanish from New Mexico's schools. Two small districts, Santa Rosa Consolidated and Chama Valley ISD, each absorbed approximately 1,500 of the affected students into their own virtual programs. The accounting is visible in the enrollment data: Santa Rosa jumped from 572 to 2,122 students, and Chama Valley from 280 to 1,866. Both are excluded from the district-level analysis here because their gains reflect student transfers between virtual providers, not organic growth.

The broader fallout has been substantial. Because New Mexico funds districts based on prior-year enrollment, Gallup-McKinley continued drawing state money for students it no longer served. The Public Education Department faced a $40 million budget shortfall because Gallup retained the funds while litigating against Stride, and the state simultaneously had to pay the receiving districts for the same students, prompting an emergency legislative response during the 2026 session. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed Senate Bill 19 to give state officials additional time to determine the overpayment amount and develop a recovery plan.

Superintendent Mike Hyatt framed the decision to cut ties with Stride as protective:

"It was our students that were taken advantage of. They're the ones -- whether they know it or not -- that were harmed in this. And that just makes me sick inside that a company did this on our watch." -- NBC News, January 2026

Even without Gallup, the cliff is real

Strip Gallup's 3,342-student loss from the statewide total and New Mexico still lost 4,991 students, a figure that would rank as the state's third-largest annual decline after the COVID year and the 2024 drop of 5,581. The decline is broad. Ninety-eight districts lost students in 2025-26, while only 49 gained. The top five losers accounted for 60% of total district-level losses.

Albuquerque Public Schools^↗ lost 2,467 students, a 3.3% decline, extending a streak that has cost the district 19,579 students since 2016. That is a 21.2% decline over 11 years. APS now enrolls 72,573 students and accounts for 24.3% of the state's total enrollment, down from 27.1% a decade ago. Despite educating fewer students each year, the district's board approved a record $2.25 billion budget for 2025-26, a $104 million increase, pushing per-pupil spending to approximately $35,000.

The losses extend beyond Albuquerque. Las Cruces^↗ lost 553 students (-2.4%), Santa Fe^↗ lost 551 (-4.9%), Gadsden^↗ lost 469 (-4.0%), and Farmington^↗ lost 349 (-3.2%). Santa Fe's 4.9% single-year decline stands out as the sharpest percentage loss among the state's major districts.

Sixty-two of 154 districts, or 40.3%, hit all-time enrollment lows in 2025-26. Only 34.3% of districts have recovered to their pre-COVID enrollment levels.

Fewer children, fewer families

The structural driver underneath the year-to-year volatility is demographic. New Mexico's birth rate has been declining since 2008, and the state now has 16.4% fewer young children than it did a decade ago, a steeper drop than the national decline of 9.6%. Deaths exceeded births for the first time in 2020 and have continued to do so each year since.

Population projections from the University of New Mexico's Geospatial and Population Studies department forecast the state's youth population (ages 0-24) will fall to 550,000 by 2040, a 20% decline over two decades. The state's total population is expected to peak at 2.16 million around 2035 before beginning to contract, driven almost entirely by growth among residents age 65 and older.

Domestic migration has been negative since 2012, with international migration providing the only offset. Rural counties face the steepest projections: Mora, De Baca, and Hidalgo counties could lose more than 40% of their populations.

The new normal runs faster

The pre-pandemic era now looks like a period of relative stability. From 2017 through 2020, New Mexico lost an average of 1,735 students per year. COVID compressed several years of decline into a single shock. But instead of recovering, the state settled into a post-COVID trajectory where annual losses average 3,999 students, more than double the old pace.

Part of this acceleration is compositional. As the enrollment base shrinks, each year's loss represents a larger share of a smaller total. A loss of 8,333 students from a base of 306,686 (2.7%) would have been only 2.5% from the 2016 base of 339,613. But the consistent direction matters more than the math: New Mexico has not posted a meaningful enrollment gain in any year since 2016. The single positive year, 2021-22, registered a gain of exactly four students.

State Senate President Pro Tempore Mimi Stewart captured the policy challenge in remarks on the Gallup virtual school controversy that apply equally to the broader enrollment picture:

"We have got to stop spending this much money on virtual schools when there's very little regulation." -- NBC News, January 2026

The legislature appropriated $4.76 billion to K-12 education for fiscal year 2025, a $580 million increase from the prior year and roughly 47% of the state's total budget. Per-pupil spending has risen by approximately $4,100 over the past five years even as the denominator continues to fall. Whether that spending can maintain service quality as enrollment declines below 300,000 is the fiscal question New Mexico will confront over the next decade.

The demographic projections offer no off-ramp. Births continue to fall. Deaths continue to exceed them. Domestic migration remains negative. Every kindergarten class that enters the system is smaller than the one before it. Districts that have already exhausted their enrollment buffers, the 62 now at all-time lows, will face consolidation decisions not in some theoretical future but within two to three budget cycles.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Carlsbad Gained 2,156 Students in Five Years, Then Lost 1,719 in Two

Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT

In a state where 87 of 132 districts lost enrollment over the past decade, Carlsbad^↗ stands alone among large traditional school districts. It gained 836 students between 2016 and 2026, a 12.5% increase, while the state as a whole shed 41,260 students (12.1%). The only other large traditional district in New Mexico that can claim any net gain at all is Hobbs^↗, 90 miles to the east, which added 41 students over the same period. That is not a typo.

But Carlsbad's 11-year trajectory is anything but a steady climb. It is a roller coaster powered by Permian Basin crude, and the ride has left the district building schools it may not fill, recruiting teachers it cannot house, and serving a student body that looks nothing like the one that entered the boom.

Five years up, two years down

The acceleration was swift. Carlsbad added 168 students in 2017, then 473, then 705, then 635. At its 2019 peak growth rate of 9.6% in a single year, the district was gaining students faster than most New Mexico districts have ever grown. By 2021, enrollment had reached 8,847, up 32.2% from 6,691 just five years earlier.

The gains tracked the oil. Between 2019 and 2024, Eddy and Lea counties accounted for 52% of all U.S. oil production growth, producing nearly 1 million additional barrels per day. Workers flooded into Carlsbad. The city's population ballooned past 52,000, straining housing, roads, and classrooms.

Then it reversed. Carlsbad lost 12 students in 2022, a tremor. In 2023, it lost 1,707, a 19.3% collapse in a single year. That single-year drop was larger than the entire decade-long enrollment loss at many mid-size New Mexico districts.

What oil gives, oil takes

The 2023 crash lines up with a familiar pattern in resource-extraction communities: the transient workforce that inflated the boom departed when the economics shifted. During the oil surge, many workers lived in RV parks and corporate housing. Monthly rents in Carlsbad climbed to $2,000 to $3,000, pricing out teachers and other public-sector workers.

The Santa Fe New Mexican reported that the district started the 2019-20 year short 15 teachers and resorted to hiring 24 international educators on work visas:

"We still probably have half of those needing to show up and we don't have housing for them." — Superintendent Gerry Washburn, Santa Fe New Mexican

When the bust hit, the district faced a different problem: the infrastructure it had built for 8,800 students now served 7,100. Carlsbad voters approved an $80 million bond in 2019 to expand capacity. That construction program, including the reopening of Riverside Elementary and expansions at Ocotillo and Desert Willow, was designed for a district that no longer exists at that size.

Three years into recovery, the district has clawed back 399 of the 1,719 students it lost, roughly 23%. Growth has slowed each year: 158 students in 2024, 179 in 2025, 62 in 2026. Whether this is a plateau or a pause depends on where oil prices and drilling activity go next.

A different kind of oil town

Carlsbad's experience diverges sharply from Hobbs^↗, the state's other major Permian Basin school district. Hobbs sits in Lea County, adjacent to Eddy County, and draws from the same oil economy. But Hobbs never boomed the same way. It peaked at 10,661 in 2020, lost 831 during COVID, and has since recovered to essentially flat. Over 11 years, Hobbs gained 41 students, a 0.4% change.

Carlsbad sits directly above the most active drilling zone in the New Mexico Permian. In 2022, Eddy County led the nation with 53 active drilling rigs. Hobbs, while also oil-dependent, has a more diversified employment base and did not experience the same in-migration surge.

Smaller Eddy County districts tell a grimmer version of the same story. Artesia^↗ peaked in 2016 at 3,961 and has declined steadily to 3,703, a loss of 258 students. Lovington^↗ fell from 3,832 to 3,300. The oil boom concentrated its enrollment gains in one district while leaving its neighbors flat or declining.

The students who stayed are different

The boom brought workers. The bust took many of them back. But the demographic composition of Carlsbad's student body shifted permanently in between.

In 2019, Hispanic students made up 56.1% of Carlsbad's enrollment. By 2026, that share had risen to 69.3%. White enrollment fell from 39.4% to 27.1% over the same period, a drop of 1,122 students in absolute terms even as Hispanic enrollment grew by 707.

The shift is visible in another metric. In 2019, 595 Carlsbad students were classified as English learners, 7.4% of the student body. By 2026, that number had reached 1,337, or 17.8%. Nearly one in five Carlsbad students now receives English language services, more than double the share seven years ago.

Whether the ELL surge reflects new arrivals drawn by oil-field work or expanded identification of students already in the district is not possible to determine from enrollment data alone. The Permian Basin has long attracted Spanish-speaking workers from both sides of the border. What is clear is that the instructional profile of the district has changed substantially: programs serving English learners carry higher per-pupil costs for staffing, materials, and compliance, and Carlsbad's ELL population more than doubled while the district was simultaneously navigating a 19% enrollment crash.

Rich county, struggling schools

Carlsbad's fiscal position is unusual for a district this volatile. New Mexico's oil and gas tax receipts totaled $11.3 billion in the 12 months ending June 2024, and a substantial share flows to public schools through the state's Land Grant Permanent Fund, which distributes over $1.3 billion annually to K-12 and higher education. The district that produces the oil also benefits from the revenue it generates statewide.

But per-pupil funding follows students. When Carlsbad lost 1,719 students in two years, the revenue dropped with them, even as the fixed costs of newly built facilities did not. The district is now operating schools designed for its 2021 peak while serving 15% fewer students.

Waiting for the next barrel

Carlsbad is adapting. It launched an Energy and Natural Resources Pathway at Carlsbad High School in 2023 with 54 students in its inaugural class, tying the curriculum directly to the industry that drives the local economy. It has invested in teacher housing to buffer against the rental spikes that accompany each oil cycle.

The 62 students Carlsbad added in 2026 suggest the recovery is decelerating. The $80 million in new schools will stay, whether the rigs do or not. So will the ELL programs that did not exist five years ago and the 1,337 English learners who need them. The boom reshaped Carlsbad's schools in ways the bust cannot undo.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

One in Five NM Students Now in Special Ed

Thu, 08 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT

New Mexico added 7,779 students to its special education rolls since 2019. In the same period, overall enrollment fell by 36,778. The result: one in five students in the state now receives special education services, a rate that exceeds the national average by more than five percentage points.

The 20.5% special education rate in 2025-26 is not just a milestone. It represents a structural shift in who New Mexico schools are serving and what those schools need to function. The state has crossed a threshold that only a handful of states have reached, and it did so while losing students, closing schools, and struggling to fill nearly 300 special education teaching vacancies.

The numbers behind the threshold

In 2018-19, 53,253 students received special education services, 15.9% of the total. By 2025-26, that count rose to 61,032 while the denominator shrank from 335,131 to 298,353. Both movements pushed the rate upward: more students identified, fewer students enrolled overall.

The increase was not steady. After a pandemic dip in 2020-21 (down 1,593 students, likely reflecting disrupted evaluations), the count recovered and then surged. The largest single-year jump came in 2023-24 (+2,582), followed by another large gain in 2024-25 (+2,138). Across those two years, the special education count rose by 4,720 students (8.5%).

That 2023-24 to 2024-25 surge deserves scrutiny. The newly available 2023-24 subgroup snapshot shows the growth was distributed across two consecutive years, not compressed into a single reporting interval.

A scissor graph: more IEPs, fewer students

Indexed to 2019, total enrollment has fallen to 89% of its starting point. Special education enrollment has risen to 115%. The gap between the two lines widened in every period except 2020-21, when pandemic disruptions temporarily suppressed both identification and enrollment.

This divergence creates a compounding fiscal problem. New Mexico's public education funding formula weights special education students at higher multipliers to reflect the cost of Individualized Education Programs, specialized staffing, and related services. As the share of students entitled to those services grows while the base enrollment generating foundation funding shrinks, districts face a structural mismatch: rising per-pupil service obligations against a declining revenue base.

Where the rate is highest

Fifty-three of the state's 152 districts with special education data now have rates above 20%. That is 34.9% of all districts, up from a far smaller share in 2019. Among the 137 districts with data in both years, 118 (86.1%) saw their special education rate increase. The median increase was 4.1 percentage points.

Albuquerque^↗ stands out. The state's largest district now has a 25.2% special education rate, up from 17.7% in 2019, a 7.5 percentage-point jump. One in four APS students has an IEP. With 18,282 students receiving services, Albuquerque alone accounts for 30.0% of the state's entire special education population. The district's total enrollment has fallen from 90,240 to 72,573 over the same period, but its special education count grew by 2,319.

Rio Rancho^↗ crossed 20% in 2024-25 and now sits at 21.3%, with 3,467 students. Las Cruces^↗, the state's second-largest district, has not yet crossed the threshold but is approaching it at 19.2%, up from 15.1%.

Smaller districts show even more extreme rates. Lovington, at 25.7%, leads among districts with at least 1,000 students. Several small districts and charters exceed 25%, though small denominators make those rates volatile.

Special ed overtakes English learners

For most of the period, special education and English learner enrollment tracked closely. In 2022-23, ELL briefly exceeded special education by 178 students. By 2025-26, the gap reversed: special education now exceeds ELL by 7,883 students. The ELL count actually declined in 2025-26 (from 55,798 to 53,149), while special education continued growing.

These are overlapping populations, not separate ones. Many students receive both ELL and special education services. But the crossover marks a shift in where the state's service demands are concentrating. Special education, with its legal entitlements to individualized instruction, related services, and due-process protections under IDEA, carries a heavier per-student operational burden than most ELL programming.

Identification, not arrival

A 14.6% increase in the special education count while total enrollment falls 11% raises an obvious question: are more students arriving with disabilities, or are more existing students being identified?

The most likely explanation is expanded identification. Nationally, the rate of students receiving IDEA services rose from 14% to 15% between 2019-20 and 2022-23, a one percentage-point increase. New Mexico's 4.6 percentage-point increase over a similar period is far steeper, suggesting state-specific factors beyond the national trend.

Several forces could be driving identification upward. Post-pandemic catch-up evaluations are one: students whose initial evaluations were delayed during 2020-21 school closures and remote learning may have been identified in waves in subsequent years, creating a backlog effect. Improved screening tools and universal screening mandates adopted by some districts may also be catching students who would previously have gone unidentified.

The Yazzie/Martinez consolidated lawsuit, decided in 2018, may also be a factor. The ruling found that New Mexico was failing to provide a sufficient education to at-risk students, English learners, Native American students, and students with disabilities. While the ruling did not directly mandate higher identification rates, the increased scrutiny on services for students with disabilities and the state's subsequent investment in compliance infrastructure may have created institutional incentives to identify students who qualify for protections.

A competing explanation is that New Mexico's poverty rate and health-access limitations contribute to genuinely higher rates of developmental disabilities. The state consistently ranks near the bottom on child well-being measures. But this would not explain the acceleration: those conditions did not change dramatically between 2019 and 2026. The rate of change points toward identification practices more than population characteristics.

A workforce that cannot keep up

The staffing implications are severe. A 2023 study by New Mexico State University's Southwest Outreach Academic Research Evaluation and Policy Center found nearly 300 special education teaching positions vacant statewide. Separately, a Legislative Finance Committee report found approximately 1,300 teachers holding special education licenses were teaching general education courses instead.

"The most inexperienced people being placed in these most challenging positions." — Mary Parr-Sanchez, president, NEA-New Mexico, April 2025

The state attempted to address the shortage with a $5,000 retention stipend program for special education teachers, funded through House Bill 2. But in spring 2025, the Public Education Department pulled funding for the retention phase after the recruitment phase consumed most available resources. More than 700 teachers had been submitted for recruitment stipends before Albuquerque Public Schools had even submitted its list. The retention stipends never materialized.

The Legislative Finance Committee had proposed a $60 million allocation over four years for special education teacher pay differentials. The governor recommended $16 million as a one-time allocation. Neither figure was designed for a state where one in five students carries an IEP.

Charter schools carry less of the load

Traditional public schools serve special education students at a 20.6% rate. Charter schools serve them at 18.1%. That gap has narrowed from 2.1 percentage points in 2019 to 2.5 in 2026, but it still means traditional districts are absorbing a disproportionate share of the state's special education obligations relative to their enrollment.

This is a common pattern nationally. Charter schools often lack the specialized staffing, related-service providers, and facility infrastructure for high-needs IEPs, which can effectively steer families of students with significant disabilities toward traditional schools. The result compounds the fiscal pressure on traditional districts: they lose students (and the per-pupil funding attached to them) to charters while retaining a higher-cost student body.

No plateau in sight

The 20% threshold is not a policy trigger in New Mexico's funding formula. There is no automatic adjustment that kicks in when a fifth of a district's students have IEPs. But the rate is now high enough that it reshapes budget assumptions. Districts budgeting for 15% or 16% special education rates, as most were doing five years ago, are operating on outdated math.

National trends suggest the rate will keep climbing: improved awareness, expanded eligibility categories, and post-pandemic screening backlogs are all still in motion. If New Mexico's trajectory holds, the state could approach 22% to 23% within two to three years, joining Pennsylvania, New York, and Maine in territory where more than one in five students carries an IEP.

Meanwhile, nearly 300 special education teaching positions sit vacant statewide. The retention stipends never materialized. And the 61,032 students with IEPs are entitled, by federal law, to individualized services regardless of whether anyone shows up to provide them.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Albuquerque Has Lost Students for 10 Straight Years

Thu, 01 Jan 2026 12:00:00 GMT

No district in New Mexico has gained students and lost them in the same breath quite like Albuquerque^↗ has avoided gaining them at all. Since 2016, APS enrollment has fallen every single year. Not once in a decade has the line ticked upward. The district enrolled 92,152 students in 2016. In 2025-26, that number was 72,573, a loss of 19,579 students, or 21.2%.

That is not just an APS problem. Those 19,579 missing students account for 47.5% of the entire state's enrollment decline over the same period, a remarkable concentration of loss in a single district.

The slow bleed, then the flood

APS was already shrinking before the pandemic. From 2016 to 2020, the district lost about 650 students per year, a manageable erosion that could be absorbed through attrition and minor adjustments. COVID changed the math entirely. In 2021 alone, APS shed 5,987 students, a 6.7% single-year collapse.

The conventional expectation was that those students would return. They did not.

Since 2021, APS has lost an average of 2,197 students per year, more than triple the pre-pandemic rate. The five post-COVID years (2021-2026) produced 10,983 in losses. The worst single post-COVID year was 2024, when the district dropped 4,263 students, a 5.3% decline that exceeded the district's own projections by more than double, costing $2.5 million in state funding.

Outpacing the state

New Mexico as a whole lost 41,260 students from 2016 to 2026, a 12.1% decline. APS declined 21.2% over the same period, nearly twice the state rate. The divergence is visible when both trajectories are indexed to a common starting point: the state's line bends downward, but APS's line bends further and faster.

APS's share of statewide enrollment has slid from 27.1% to 24.3%. That 2.8 percentage-point shift represents a structural rebalancing. A district that once enrolled more than one in four New Mexico students now enrolls fewer than one in four.

Among New Mexico's 15 largest districts (those enrolling more than 5,000 students), only two avoided decline: Hobbs^↗, which was essentially flat at +0.4%, and Carlsbad^↗, which grew 12.5% on the strength of Permian Basin oil-economy migration. Every other large district shrank. But APS's 21.2% decline matches Gallup^↗'s 21.2% and trails only Central Consolidated at 33.5%.

The distinction between APS and Gallup is scale. Gallup lost 2,522 students. APS lost nearly eight times as many.

Three forces pulling at once

No single explanation accounts for a 10-year decline of this magnitude.

The most likely driver is demographic contraction. New Mexico was one of only four states to lose population in 2025, and the underlying trend is bleak: deaths exceeded births by approximately 11,500 people statewide between 2020 and 2025. More than 10,500 residents left for other states in that same window. Jacqueline Miller, a demographer at the University of New Mexico's Geospatial and Population Studies Center, told KOB 4 that "our natural change is going to continue to be negative, which means the only way to have growth is through migration." International migration to New Mexico fell approximately 73% from 2024 to 2025 under tightened federal immigration enforcement.

Charter school expansion is pulling students too. Statewide charter enrollment grew from 13,534 students in 2019 to 21,734 in 2026, a 60.6% increase across 57 charter entities. The data cannot isolate how many charter students would otherwise be in APS specifically, but the timing is suggestive: APS's sharpest post-COVID declines coincided with the charter sector's fastest growth.

A harder-to-quantify pressure comes from the district itself. A state-mandated review of APS found that falling birth rates and increased charter enrollment are driving down APS enrollment, and that most APS elementary school classes are enrolled below statutory maximums, presenting opportunities for consolidation.

A district that is changing shape

The decline is not evenly distributed across the student body. From 2019 to 2026, every racial and ethnic group in APS shrank. White enrollment fell 30.8%, from 19,723 to 13,645. Black enrollment fell 37.0%, from 3,031 to 1,910. Hispanic enrollment, by far the district's largest group, fell 19.0%, from 59,735 to 48,397. Native American enrollment fell 21.8%, from 4,968 to 3,884.

Because Hispanic students are declining at a slightly lower rate than other groups, their share has remained essentially stable, at 66.2% in 2019 and 66.7% in 2026. White students' share fell from 21.9% to 18.8%. A caveat: New Mexico introduced a multiracial category in 2025, and some of the apparent decline in individual race groups reflects students reclassified as multiracial rather than actual departures.

Separately, the composition of services APS provides has shifted substantially. Special education enrollment rose from 15,963 to 18,282 over the same period, an increase of 2,319 students even as total enrollment fell by 17,667. The result: one in four APS students, 25.2%, now receives special education services, compared to 17.7% in 2019. The statewide average is 20.5%. English learner enrollment held roughly steady at about 14,600 to 15,500 students, but the share rose from 16.9% to 20.2% as the denominator shrank.

The instructional programs these students receive carry higher per-pupil costs. As the students leaving APS skew toward general education, the proportion of students entitled to specialized services rises, creating a structural mismatch between the funding model's assumptions and the district's actual obligations.

More money, fewer desks

APS adopted a $2.15 billion budget for 2024-2025 and is on track for $2.3 billion in 2025-2026. Per-pupil spending has climbed from roughly $15,574 in 2016 to an estimated $35,384 in the coming year. The budget has not contracted with enrollment. It has grown.

"We are currently identifying essential areas that require funding and exploring alternative funding sources for key initiatives." — APS CFO Rennette Apodaca, NM Education

Whether that per-pupil increase translates to better outcomes is an open question. Reporting from the Southwest Public Policy Institute notes that only 40% of APS high school students test proficient in reading and 26% in math. Per-pupil spending doubling while proficiency rates remain low is the kind of fact that fuels school choice arguments, and New Mexico's legislature will face intensifying pressure to expand alternatives as APS continues to shrink.

What to watch in 2027

APS's 10-year streak is tied with Taos^↗ and Socorro^↗ for the longest consecutive decline in the state. The difference is that APS is 34 times the size of Taos and 56 times the size of Socorro, which means the fiscal and operational consequences are visible across everything from bus routes to bond capacity.

The 2024 drop of 4,263 was the steepest post-COVID loss. In 2025 and 2026, losses moderated to 1,059 and 2,467 respectively. If that deceleration holds, APS may settle around 65,000 to 70,000 students. If it does not, the district hits 65,000 by 2028, at which point schools designed for 90,000 will be operating at less than three-quarters capacity. APS has already shuttered 22 schools since 2006. The consolidation math says more will follow. The buildings will still be there. The students will not.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

New Mexico Falls Below 300,000 Students

Thu, 25 Dec 2025 12:00:00 GMT

In 10 years of enrollment data, New Mexico has had exactly one year without a decline: 2021-22, when the state gained four students. Four. Every other year, the count dropped. In 2025-26, it dropped below 300,000 for the first time.

The state enrolled 298,353 public school students in 2025-26, down 8,333 from 2024-25 and 41,260 from its 2015-16 peak of 339,613. That is a 12.1% loss over a decade, concentrated in the state's largest districts and accelerating in ways that suggest the bottom is not close.

A decline that keeps getting faster

Before COVID, New Mexico was losing students at a pace of roughly 1,735 per year. The pandemic blew a hole in the trendline: 14,323 students vanished in a single year, 2020-21. The state briefly stabilized in 2021-22. It has not stabilized since.

The post-COVID pace, from 2022-23 through 2025-26, averages 5,000 students lost per year. That is 2.9 times the pre-pandemic rate. The two worst years outside of COVID itself were 5,581 lost in 2023-24 and 8,333 in 2025-26. The 2025-26 drop is the largest non-pandemic annual loss in the dataset.

Part of the 2025-26 figure reflects a one-time distortion. Gallup-McKinley County Schools^↗ canceled its virtual education contract with Stride Inc. in mid-2025, displacing approximately 3,000 online students who transferred to other districts. Because New Mexico's funding formula pays districts based on prior-year enrollment, Gallup continued drawing state funds for students it no longer served, creating a $40 million shortfall that prompted emergency legislation in January 2026. Strip Gallup's 3,342-student loss from the statewide figure and the state still lost 4,991 students, a figure worse than any pre-COVID year.

Five districts account for nearly three-quarters of the loss

The decline is not evenly distributed. Five districts, Albuquerque^↗, Santa Fe^↗, Las Cruces^↗, Gallup-McKinley, and Gadsden^↗, account for 30,062 of the state's 41,260-student loss since 2015-16. That is 72.9% of the total.

Albuquerque alone accounts for 47.5% of the statewide decline. The district has lost students every year for 10 consecutive years, falling from 92,152 to 72,573, a 21.2% contraction. Its share of statewide enrollment has slipped from 27.1% to 24.3%, meaning the state's largest district is shrinking faster than the state itself.

The fiscal consequences are mounting. APS budgeted for a 2% enrollment decline in 2023-24 and got 5%, costing $2.5 million in State Equalization Guarantee funding the district had already planned to spend. The district's nearly $2.2 billion budget now exceeds the City of Albuquerque's.

Smaller districts face steeper percentage declines. Central Consolidated^↗ has lost 33.5% of its enrollment since 2015-16. Espanola^↗ has lost 37.3%. Three districts, Albuquerque, Socorro^↗, and Taos^↗, have declined every single year for a decade straight.

What is driving the acceleration

The most likely structural driver is a sustained decline in births. New Mexico's fertility rate has been falling since 2007, and UNM population researchers project the state's 0-to-24 population will drop by 20% between 2020 and 2040. Births in the state have been in steady decline since 2008, and those smaller cohorts are now working their way through elementary grades and into middle school.

Outmigration compounds the problem. UNM's Geospatial and Population Studies office projects the state's total population will peak around 2.16 million in 2035 and then begin a sustained decline. For a state that is already shrinking its school-age population, every family that leaves accelerates the math.

The growth of alternatives to traditional public schools also plays a role. Johns Hopkins researchers estimate that about 7% of New Mexico's K-12 students were homeschooled in 2022-23, nearly triple the 2.5% rate in 2019-20. Charter school enrollment has also grown, with over 30,000 students now attending charters statewide. These shifts redistribute students rather than remove them from the state, but they pull enrollment from the traditional districts that dominate the loss totals.

More money, fewer students

The enrollment decline is happening against a backdrop of historic investment. The New Mexico Legislature appropriated $4.76 billion for K-12 education in FY2025, with $4.2 billion flowing through the State Equalization Guarantee formula. Per-pupil spending has risen by roughly $4,100 over five years. In a funding formula that follows students, fewer students means fewer dollars flowing to districts, even as fixed costs for facilities, transportation, and staffing remain.

That tension is sharpest in the context of the Yazzie/Martinez court case. A state court found in 2025 that New Mexico remains out of compliance with its 2018 obligation to adequately fund education for at-risk students, including English learners, Native American students, students with disabilities, and students from low-income families. A Legislative Education Study Committee report found that while total education spending rose from $2.8 billion to $4.4 billion between FY2019 and FY2025, the share of funds spent on at-risk student services fell from 75.4% to 23% between FY2020 and FY2023.

"The State's submission is not a true remedial plan, but a collection of existing programs and broad aspirations that fails to explain what changes will be made, how much they will cost, when they will happen, or who will be responsible if students continue to be left behind." — New Mexico Poverty Law Center, February 2026

Fifty-nine of 156 districts are at their all-time enrollment low in 2025-26. Only 35.3% of districts have recovered to their pre-COVID enrollment levels. Ninety-eight districts declined in 2025-26; 49 grew.

Where the trendline points

At the three-year average pace of roughly 6,000 students lost per year, New Mexico would fall below 275,000 by 2030 and below 250,000 by 2035. Those projections assume the current pace holds, which it may not. The Gallup virtual school disruption inflated the 2025-26 loss, and future years may be smaller if that effect does not recur. But the underlying birth-rate trajectory and outmigration pattern offer no obvious mechanism for reversal.

The 2027 count day will arrive in October. If it shows another 5,000 to 7,000 students gone without a comparable one-time event, the acceleration is structural, not a Gallup aftershock. And a state that crossed below 300,000 in 2025-26 would be on pace to cross below 250,000 within a decade, a level that would force the legislature to reckon with a school system built for a population that no longer exists.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Native American Students Fall Below 10% of NM Enrollment

Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:00:00 GMT

New Mexico is one of three states where Native American children make up at least 10% of public school enrollment. Or it was. In 2025-26, Native American students slipped to 9.9% of enrollment, the first time their share has fallen below that threshold in available state data. The milestone arrived not through a single catastrophic year but through a six-year erosion that accelerated sharply when a contract dispute in the state's largest Navajo-serving district displaced thousands of students.

The 29,401 Native American students enrolled in 2025-26 represent a loss of 5,602 from the 2019-20 peak of 35,003, a 16.0% decline. That rate of loss is half again as steep as the state's overall 10.3% enrollment drop over the same period. In a state whose education system is under court order to improve outcomes for Native students, the shrinking count raises a paradox: the population most directly covered by the Yazzie/Martinez ruling is getting smaller even as the mandate to serve them grows.

A Steady Slide, Then a Cliff

The decline did not begin suddenly. Native American enrollment peaked at 35,003 in 2019-20, ticked down modestly through 2022-23 (to 33,790, a loss of 1,213 over three years), then fell by 3,188 in a single two-year span from 2022-23 to 2024-25. The 2025-26 count of 29,401 represents another 1,201 lost in one year.

The share trajectory tells a related but distinct story. During the COVID years of 2020-21 and 2021-22, Native American students actually gained share (rising to 10.75%) even as their absolute count declined. Total enrollment was falling faster. That cushion evaporated by 2024-25, when the share dipped to 9.98%, and it fell further to 9.85% in 2025-26.

The gap between Native American enrollment losses and statewide losses is substantial. Since 2019-20, the state lost 34,319 students total. Native American students account for 5,602 of that loss, or 16.3%, despite representing only about 10% of the student body. Every other major racial group also declined in absolute terms (white enrollment fell 25.9%, Hispanic fell 6.8%), but Native American students are declining faster than the overall rate while already being a far smaller group.

The Gallup Rupture

No district explains this story more than Gallup-McKinley County Schools^↗. In 2025-26, Gallup lost 3,342 students in a single year, dropping from 12,737 to 9,395, a 26.2% decline. Of the 1,201 Native American students lost statewide between 2024-25 and 2025-26, Gallup accounted for 673, or 56%.

The cause is specific and documented. In May 2025, the Gallup school board voted to terminate its contract with Stride Inc. (formerly K12), a virtual education provider that had enrolled roughly 4,000 students statewide through the district. The termination, effective June 30, 2025, followed allegations of academic and legal violations, including graduation rates that plunged from 55.8% in 2022 to 27.7% in 2024 and math proficiency scores of just 5.6% for Stride students.

The displacement was swift. Many families continued with Stride through new contracts that Santa Rosa and Chama Valley school districts signed in July 2025, which explains why those two small districts show sudden gains in Native American enrollment (Santa Rosa went from zero to 164 Native American students; Chama Valley from 21 to 160). Gallup's loss was partly redistributed, not purely lost to the system.

"It was our students that were taken advantage of... that just makes me sick inside that a company did this on our watch." — Superintendent Mike Hyatt, NBC News, February 2026

But the Stride saga is layered over a deeper problem. Even before the contract termination, Gallup's Native American enrollment was falling: from 9,067 in 2019-20 to 8,027 in 2024-25, a loss of 1,040 that had nothing to do with virtual school reshuffling. The district, which has the highest rate of Navajo enrollment in the country with half its 32 schools on tribal land, has faced persistent criticism over equity. A Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission report found that schools on the reservation received fewer resources than those off tribal land, with some students lacking basic utilities.

"Historically, education's been a tool to civilize, to assimilate, to acculturate Navajo people." — Commission Chair Wendy Greyeyes, Searchlight New Mexico

Beyond Gallup: A Geography of Loss

Strip Gallup from the data and the statewide decline still amounts to 3,889 students since the 2019-20 peak, a 15.0% loss. The pattern is broad. Of 70 districts that enrolled Native American students in both 2019-20 and 2025-26, 36 lost students and 33 gained them, but the losers are far larger. The top five districts by Native American enrollment (Gallup, Albuquerque^↗, Farmington^↗, Central Consolidated, and Grants^↗) hold 69% of all Native American students statewide. The top 10 hold 83%.

Central Consolidated^↗, headquartered in Shiprock on the Navajo Nation, has lost 1,422 Native American students since 2019-20 (a 28.0% decline) and its total enrollment has fallen from 5,653 to 4,219. Zuni Public Schools^↗, where 96% of students are Native American, dropped from 1,299 to 975, a 24.9% loss. Albuquerque, the state's largest district, lost 1,201 Native American students (23.6%), reflecting both the statewide trend and urban migration patterns.

Even districts farther from reservation communities show losses. Rio Rancho^↗ lost 31.2% of its Native American students. Los Lunas^↗ lost 32.0%. These are smaller absolute numbers (283 and 173, respectively) but steep proportional declines that suggest the trend extends beyond reservation-adjacent districts.

What Shrinking Enrollment Does Not Tell You

The enrollment data cannot distinguish between families who left public schools and families whose children aged out or were never born. Nationally, the American Indian and Alaska Native child population declined by nearly 134,000 between 2000 and 2023, according to the Annie E. Casey Foundation, with the largest losses among children under age five. New Mexico, where Native American children represent roughly 10% of the child population, is one of three states with the highest such concentration, alongside Alaska and South Dakota.

A shrinking base population means some enrollment decline is demographic gravity, not a policy failure or a sign of dissatisfaction. But the rate matters. Native American enrollment in New Mexico fell 16.0% from 2019-20 to 2025-26, while overall enrollment fell 10.3%. If the decline were purely demographic, both rates would track more closely. The gap suggests additional factors at work: families choosing alternatives to public school, pandemic-era disengagement that never reversed, or structural issues in the districts that serve the largest Native populations.

The multiracial reclassification that New Mexico introduced in 2022 complicates the picture further. The state went from reporting zero multiracial students to 7,221 in 2024-25. Some portion of students previously counted as Native American may now be classified as multiracial, making the apparent decline partly a measurement artifact. The magnitude is unknowable from enrollment data alone.

Fewer students, bigger mandate

New Mexico's public education system operates under a 2018 court ruling in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez case, which found the state in violation of its constitution for failing to adequately educate Native American students, English learners, students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students. In April 2025, a judge found the state still out of compliance and ordered a new action plan.

The plan the Public Education Department produced drew objections from nearly all 23 tribes in the state. The All Pueblo Council of Governors wrote that the agency had not consulted them. As of February 2026, plaintiffs and tribal leaders were asking the judge to reject the plan entirely.

The enrollment decline sharpens this tension. The Yazzie mandate requires the state to invest specifically in programs for Native students: culturally relevant curricula, Native language instruction, community-based support. Those programs depend on enrollment-driven funding. As the number of Native American students shrinks, the per-student cost of maintaining specialized services rises, creating pressure to consolidate programs precisely when the court says they should expand. Dulce Independent Schools^↗, which serves the Jicarilla Apache Nation and lost 104 Native American students (19.3%) since 2019-20, enrolls just 434 Native American students in a remote community with no nearby alternatives.

What to Watch

The Gallup situation remains unresolved. In March 2026, the district announced it had settled with Stride and reinstated a modified contract through June 2026. Whether the thousands of students who transferred to Santa Rosa and Chama Valley return to Gallup in 2026-27 will determine whether the 2025-26 3,342-student loss was a one-time redistribution or a permanent fracture in how virtual education is delivered across the Navajo Nation.

The deeper question is structural. Six majority-Native American districts (Gallup, Central, Zuni, Cuba^↗, Dulce, and Jemez Valley^↗) enrolled 13,077 Native American students in 2025-26. That number was 16,929 in 2018-19. These districts serve communities where the school is often the largest employer and the primary institution connecting children to their language and culture. Losing nearly a quarter of their enrollment in seven years does not just change a budget line. It changes what a school can be.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

Gallup Loses a Quarter of Its Students in One Year

Thu, 11 Dec 2025 12:00:00 GMT

Gallup-McKinley County Schools^↗ reported 12,737 students in 2024-25. In 2025-26, it reported 9,395. The 3,342-student drop, a 26.2% loss in a single year, is the third-largest single-year district loss in New Mexico history, behind only Albuquerque^↗'s pandemic-year collapses. It accounts for 40.1% of the state's entire enrollment decline in 2025-26.

But most of those students were never in a Gallup-McKinley classroom. They were enrolled in a virtual school operated by Stride Inc. (formerly K12 Inc.) under a contract the district signed in June 2020. When the board terminated that contract in spring 2025, approximately 3,000 virtual students scattered to other districts. The enrollment crash is real in the data. Whether it reflects a real loss of students, or the correction of a five-year accounting distortion, is the harder question.

The Stride era: five years of phantom growth

Before the Stride contract, Gallup-McKinley was a slowly declining district. From 2016 to 2020, enrollment fell from 11,917 to 11,298, a loss of about 150 students per year. The district ranked seventh in New Mexico by enrollment.

That trajectory reversed in 2020-21, when the district added 1,120 students in a single year, the only large gain in its recent history. The growth coincided with the first full year of the Stride/K12 virtual program, which signed up roughly 1,000 students from across New Mexico in its first year. By 2024-25, the virtual enrollment had grown to approximately 3,000.

The virtual students showed up in Gallup-McKinley's official count, boosting the district from seventh-largest to fourth-largest in the state. They also generated per-pupil funding. The district was not hiding this arrangement; it was operating under New Mexico's rules for virtual education, which had not been substantially overhauled since 2007.

The school-level data shows how the virtual students were distributed across campuses. Gallup Central Alternative, historically a small campus serving around 200 students, ballooned to 1,244 in 2024-25. Lincoln Elementary spiked from 243 to 1,094 in 2020-21 before falling back. Several middle schools showed enrollment increases from 2019 to 2025 that ran counter to statewide demographic trends.

The contract termination

In April 2025, the Gallup-McKinley board voted to end its Stride contract, effective June 30, 2025. The district cited severe academic and legal violations: graduation rates in the Stride-managed program had fallen from 55.8% in 2022 to 27.7% in 2024, math proficiency had dropped to 5.6%, and teachers were sometimes assigned more than 200 students, well above state limits.

"Our students deserve educational providers that prioritize their academic success, not corporate profit margins." — Chris Mortensen, School Board President, GMCS press release, May 2025

Stride responded with five lawsuits against the district. The company then secured contracts with Santa Rosa Consolidated Schools^↗ and Chama Valley Independent School District^↗, each absorbing roughly 1,500 of the virtual students. The data confirms this: Santa Rosa's enrollment jumped from 572 to 2,122 (+1,550), and Chama Valley went from 280 to 1,866 (+1,586). The combined gain of 3,136 almost exactly matches Gallup's 3,342-student loss.

A $35 million statewide problem

Because New Mexico's State Equalization Guarantee is based on prior-year enrollment, Gallup was funded in 2025-26 for approximately 3,000 students it no longer served. At the same time, Santa Rosa and Chama Valley absorbed those students without corresponding funding. The result was a $35 million shortfall in the state funding formula, with the full double-payment scenario threatening a $75 million gap that would have forced cuts at schools statewide.

The legislature passed HB 253 to address the crisis, halting approximately $20 million each for Chama Valley and Santa Rosa and reducing Gallup-McKinley's allocation by $23 million. The bill also represents the state's first major overhaul of virtual education regulation since 2007.

In March 2026, the Gallup-McKinley board settled its dispute with Stride, reinstating a modified contract for K-12 tutoring services through June 2026 and withdrawing all complaints.

Every campus lost students

The virtual school termination does not fully explain the 2026 numbers. Even excluding Gallup Central Alternative entirely, the district's remaining campuses fell from 11,488 in 2024-25 to 9,122 in 2025-26, a loss of 2,366 students (20.6%). This suggests virtual students had been counted at campuses across the district, not just at Central Alternative.

The middle schools were hit hardest: combined enrollment across seven campuses fell from 2,873 to 1,368, a 52.4% collapse. Crownpoint Middle lost 67.7% of its students. Navajo Middle School lost 63.4%. Not a single one of the district's 32 campuses gained enrollment.

The real enrollment underneath

Strip away the virtual distortion, and Gallup-McKinley still faces a genuine enrollment decline. The district had 11,448 students in 2018-19, the last year before the Stride contract. It has 9,395 now. That is a loss of 2,053 students (17.9%) over seven years, a steeper trajectory than the state average and one that predates the virtual school controversy.

The demographic composition reveals the scope of the virtual inflation. In 2024-25, when virtual students swelled the count, Gallup's Native American share fell to 63.0%, the lowest on record for a district that historically serves an approximately 79% Native American student body. Non-Native enrollment nearly tripled: white students rose from 571 (2019) to 1,110 (2025), and Hispanic students from 1,591 to 2,740. In 2025-26, with the virtual students gone, the Native American share snapped back to 78.3%, and absolute non-Native enrollment fell by more than half.

This pattern is consistent with a virtual program that enrolled students from across New Mexico, most of whom were not Native American, under the Gallup-McKinley umbrella. The district's actual Native American enrollment declined from 9,061 (2019) to 7,354 (2026), a loss of 1,707 students (18.8%). That loss, spread over seven years in a region where poverty rates are triple the national average and some students face two-hour bus rides to school, is the enrollment story that the virtual inflation obscured.

What families are left with

Gallup-McKinley now ranks eighth in New Mexico by enrollment, down from fourth a year ago. The district has reopened virtual options through new contractors, OpenEd and Graduation Alliance, following a competitive procurement process. Whether these programs will attract the same scale of enrollment remains to be seen.

The broader question is what five years of virtual inflation cost. Gallup-McKinley was funded as a 12,000-student district while its brick-and-mortar schools served closer to 9,000. A Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission report has spotlighted systemic inequities at the district, including treatment of Native American students and staff. As superintendent Mike Hyatt told NBC News: "It was our students that were taken advantage of. They're the ones that were harmed in this."

The 2026-27 count day will show whether the 9,395 figure represents a new floor for a district in genuine decline, or whether the departure of virtual students has further destabilized the physical schools that remain. For the 7,354 Native American students still enrolled, the answer will determine class sizes, bus routes, and whether schools in Crownpoint, Tohatchi, and Thoreau stay open.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.

New Mexico Publishes 2025-26 Enrollment Data

Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:00:00 GMT

In this series: New Mexico 2025-26 Enrollment.

A year ago, New Mexico lost 4,211 students. Superintendents talked about stabilization. The post-COVID hemorrhage, which had erased 14,323 students in a single year, seemed to be easing. The state had even managed one year — 2021-22 — with a gain: four students. Not four thousand. Four.

Then the New Mexico Public Education Department published its 2025-26 enrollment figures, and stabilization vanished: 298,353 public school students, down 8,333 from the prior year. That is the second-largest annual loss on record, behind only COVID, and it pushes the state below 300,000 for the first time. New Mexico has now lost 41,260 students since 2015-16, a 12.1% decline with no bottom in sight. Whatever floor people thought they saw last year was not a floor.

What the numbers open up

The enrollment data covers roughly 156 districts and charter entities, from the state's largest urban systems to tiny rural districts in the Rio Grande valley and on tribal lands. Over the coming weeks, The NMEdTribune will unpack it in a series of data-driven articles. Here is what jumps out first.

A virtual school contract blew up a district's enrollment. Gallup-McKinley County Schools^↗ reported 12,737 students in 2024-25. In 2025-26, it reported 9,395. That 26.2% single-year loss — the third-largest in state history — accounts for 40% of the state's total decline. But most of those students were never in a Gallup classroom. They were enrolled through a Stride Inc. virtual program that the board terminated amid academic and legal violations.

Albuquerque has lost students for 10 straight years. APS^↗ has shed 19,579 students since its peak, a 21.2% contraction that accounts for nearly half the statewide decline. The district now enrolls fewer students than it did before No Child Left Behind, and the pace is accelerating.

Below 300,000 for the first time. The milestone is not just symbolic. New Mexico's school-age population has been shrinking since 2008, and UNM researchers project a 20% decline in the 0-to-24 population by 2040. The kindergarten class has fallen 20% while 12th grade has grown — the pipeline that once fed the system has inverted.

By the numbers: 298,353 students statewide in 2025-26 — down 8,333 from the prior year, a 2.7% decline, the second-largest annual loss on record, and the first time below 300,000.

The threads we are following

59 districts just hit all-time lows. More than a third of New Mexico's districts are at the lowest enrollment ever recorded. That includes Albuquerque^↗, Las Cruces^↗, and Santa Fe^↗.

Nearly one in five students is now in special education. Special ed enrollment climbed to 19.6% of total enrollment in 2025-26, approaching a one-in-five threshold that no one predicted a decade ago. The growth is real and sustained across identification categories.

White enrollment fell below 20%. Non-Hispanic white students now make up fewer than one in five New Mexico public school students — 19.6%, down from 23.5% in 2019. The state's enrollment is becoming more Hispanic and less white at a pace that is outrunning national trends.

What comes next

Each of these threads will get its own article with charts, district-level breakdowns, and context. New articles publish Thursdays. The first deep dive, next week, looks at how a single virtual school contract blew up a district's enrollment and exposed a $35 million hole in the state's funding formula.

The enrollment figures come from the New Mexico Public Education Department 40-Day headcount for public school districts and charter entities statewide.

Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.